Resilience, Reinvention and Transition during and after Quarantine

作者: Kristof Van Assche , Martijn Duineveld , S. Jeff Birchall , Leith Deacon , Raoul Beunen

DOI: 10.1177/1206331220938628

关键词:

摘要: Quarantine measures and the crises triggering them are never neutral in sense that a return to past is impossible. These also signal of other things like systemic risks weaknesses. A period quarantine thing by itself. What happens after thus shaped both state social-ecological system preceding what happened during quarantine. The selectivities introduced span discursive, institutional material realms. Old discourses can with new meaning. Social economic relations reappear seemingly unchanged, they be more visibly altered dismantled. Ideologies, however, understood here as master discourses, read problems solutions their own way do not necessarily come closer each or disappear. All this, offers food for thought regarding possibilities limits resilience transition. We argue current COVID- 19 pandemic casts doubt on generic applicability theories transition, yet sheds light value both. propose concept reinvention describe happening could happen coordinated fashion. crisis reveals mechanisms systems dynamics point at existence multiple pathways dramatic shocks. Some shocks system- specific responses (such particular kind quarantine) amenable strategies afterwards, while others require path radical They might needed: rather stark transition now ensure future resilience. While outline clear, some desirable features clear damages system. Also argument transitional governance, temporary governance (beyond which enable construction long term perspectives tools meant reduce chances this one reoccuring.

参考文章(9)
Simin Davoudi, Elizabeth Brooks, Abid Mehmood, Evolutionary Resilience and Strategies for Climate Adaptation Planning Practice and Research. ,vol. 28, pp. 307- 322 ,(2013) , 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
Darren Sinclair, Self‐Regulation Versus Command and Control? Beyond False Dichotomies Law & Policy. ,vol. 19, pp. 529- 559 ,(1997) , 10.1111/1467-9930.00037
Frank W. Geels, The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms Environmental innovation and societal transitions. ,vol. 1, pp. 24- 40 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.EIST.2011.02.002
Stephen Bigger, Victor Turner, liminality, and cultural performance the Journal of Beliefs and Values. ,vol. 30, pp. 209- 212 ,(2009) , 10.1080/13617670903175238
Martijn Duineveld, Kristof Van Assche, Raoul Beunen, Re-conceptualising political landscapes after the material turn: a typology of material events Landscape Research. ,vol. 42, pp. 375- 384 ,(2017) , 10.1080/01426397.2017.1290791
Raoul Beunen, James Patterson, Kristof Van Assche, Governing for resilience: the role of institutional work Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. ,vol. 28, pp. 10- 16 ,(2017) , 10.1016/J.COSUST.2017.04.010
Kristof Van Assche, Raoul Beunen, Martijn Duineveld, Monica Gruezmacher, Power/knowledge and natural resource management: Foucaultian foundations in the analysis of adaptive governance Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. ,vol. 19, pp. 308- 322 ,(2017) , 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1338560
Kristof Van Assche, Gert Verschraegen, Vladislav Valentinov, Monica Gruezmacher, The social, the ecological, and the adaptive. Von Bertalanffy's general systems theory and the adaptive governance of social‐ecological systems Systems Research and Behavioral Science. ,vol. 36, pp. 308- 321 ,(2019) , 10.1002/SRES.2587
Kristof Van Assche, Monica Gruezmacher, Leith Deacon, Land use tools for tempering boom and bust: Strategy and capacity building in governance Land Use Policy. ,vol. 93, pp. 103994- ,(2020) , 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2019.05.013