Default Risk and the Effective Duration of Bonds

作者: David F. Babbel

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: September 1995 Estimates of how much credit risk shortens the effective duration of corporate bonds based on observable data and easily estimated bond pricing parameters. Basis risk is the risk attributable to uncertain movements in the spread between yields associated with a particular financial instrument or class of instruments, and a reference interest rate over time. There are seven types of basis risk: Yields on * Long-term versus short-term financial instruments. * Domestic currency versus foreign currencies. * Liquid versus illiquid investments. * Bonds with higher or lower sensitivity to changes in interest rate volatility. * Taxable versus tax-free instruments. * Spot versus futures contracts. * Default-free versus non - default-free securities. Basis risk makes it difficult for the fixed-income portfolio manager to measure the portfolio's exposure to interest rate risk, heightens the anxiety of traders and arbitrageurs who are hedging their investments, and compounds the financial institution's problem of matching assets and liabilities. Much attention has been paid to the first type of basis risk. In recent years, attention has turned toward understanding the relation between credit risk and duration. Babbel, Merrill, and Panning focus on that, emphasizing the importance of taking credit risk into account when computing measures of duration. The consensus of all work in this area is that credit risk shortens the effective duration of corporate bonds. The authors estimate how much durations shorten because of credit risk, basing their estimates on observable data and easily estimated bond pricing parameters. An earlier version of this paper -- a product of the Financial Sector Development Department -- was presented at the Second Biennial Conference on the Financial Dynamics of the Insurance Industry, New York University.

参考文章(18)
Krishna Ramaswamy, Suresh M. Sundaresan, The valuation of floating-rate instruments Journal of Financial Economics. ,vol. 17, pp. 251- 272 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0304-405X(86)90066-8
David F. Babbel, Interest rate dynamics and the term structure Journal of Banking & Finance. ,vol. 12, pp. 401- 417 ,(1988) , 10.1016/0378-4266(88)90006-4
G. O. Bierwag, George G. Kaufman, Cynthia M. Latta, BOND PORTFOLIO IMMUNIZATION: TESTS OF MATURITY, ONE- AND TWO-FACTOR DURATION MATCHING STRATEGIES The Financial Review. ,vol. 22, pp. 203- 219 ,(1987) , 10.1111/J.1540-6288.1987.TB00761.X
MARSHALL E. BLUME, DONALD B. KEIM, SANDEEP A. PATEL, Returns and Volatility of Low-Grade Bonds 1977–1989 Journal of Finance. ,vol. 46, pp. 49- 74 ,(1991) , 10.1111/J.1540-6261.1991.TB03745.X
DON M. CHANCE, Default Risk and the Duration of Zero Coupon Bonds Journal of Finance. ,vol. 45, pp. 265- 274 ,(1990) , 10.1111/J.1540-6261.1990.TB05092.X
John C. Cox, Jonathan E. Ingersoll, Jr., Stephen A. Ross, Duration and the Measurement of Basis Risk The Journal of Business. ,vol. 52, pp. 51- 61 ,(1979) , 10.1086/296033
ROBERT A. JARROW, STUART M. TURNBULL, Pricing Derivatives on Financial Securities Subject to Credit Risk Journal of Finance. ,vol. 50, pp. 53- 85 ,(1995) , 10.1111/J.1540-6261.1995.TB05167.X
JEROME S. FONS, The Default Premium and Corporate Bond Experience Journal of Finance. ,vol. 42, pp. 81- 97 ,(1987) , 10.1111/J.1540-6261.1987.TB02551.X
Robert Geske, The Valuation of Corporate Liabilities as Compound Options The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. ,vol. 12, pp. 541- 552 ,(1977) , 10.2307/2330330