摘要: R ESUMEN El objetivo de este articulo es reivindicar que las lenguas senas o signos son sistemas linguisticos naturales y no codigos artificiales comunicacion que, por tanto, deben ser estudiadas como tales desde disciplinas cientificas. Con objetivo, presentamos evidencias Neurolinguisticas Psicolinguisticas contradicen prejuicio linguistico arraigado en nuestra sociedad e incluso ambitos academicos universitarios. ABSTRACT The aim of this article is to vindicate that signed languages are natural linguistic systems and not artificial communication codes. Therefore, as such they should be considered by researchers. With goal in mind, Neurolinguistics Psycholinguistic evidences, which challenge prejudice deep-rooted our society even academic environments, presented.
us.es
unirioja.es
sci-hub.st 参考文章(36)
Laura Ann Petitto, On The Biological Foundations of Human Language ,(2000)
María Victoria Camacho-Taboada, M. Reyes-Tejedor, Patologías del lenguaje: Lingüística, afasias y agramatismos ,(2007)
Philip Lieberman, Toward an Evolutionary Biology of Language ,(2006)
Robert Chaudenson, Les créoles français F. Nathan. ,(1979)
Wendy Sandler, Diane C. Lillo-Martin, Sign Language and Linguistic Universals ,(2006)
Philip Lieberman, The Biology and Evolution of Language ,(1984)
Philip Lieberman, The Evolution of Human Speech Its Anatomical and Neural Bases Current Anthropology. ,vol. 48, pp. 39- 66 ,(2007) , 10.1086/509092
Salikoko S. Mufwene, The ecology of language evolution ,(2001)
Wendy Sandler, Diane Lillo-Martin, Natural Sign Languages Blackwell Publishers Ltd. pp. 533- 562 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470756409.CH22
F Vargha-Khadem, JA Hurst, SE Fisher, AP Monaco, Csl Lai, A novel forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder American Journal of Human Genetics. ,(2001)