Genetic basis of between-individual and within-individual variance of docility.

作者: J. G. A. Martin , E. Pirotta , M. B. Petelle , D. T. Blumstein

DOI: 10.1111/JEB.13048

关键词:

摘要: Between-individual variation in phenotypes within a population is the basis of evolution. However, evolutionary and behavioural ecologists have mainly focused on estimating between-individual variance mean trait neglected within-individual variance, or predictability trait. In fact, an important assumption mixed-effects models used to estimate traits that residual (predictability) identical across individuals. Individual heterogeneity behaviours potentially effect but rarely estimated accounted for. We 11 389 measures docility behaviour from 1576 yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris) both its predictability. then implemented double hierarchical animal model decompose variances into their environmental genetic components. found individuals differed with negative phenotypic covariance. also significant for no covariance between two. This analysis one first both mean wild population. Our results indicate equal should not be assumed. demonstrate importance illustrate potential bias ignoring conclude variability ignored, present coherent approach quantification.

参考文章(41)
M. FELLEKI, D. LEE, Y. LEE, A. R. GILMOUR, L. RÖNNEGÅRD, Estimation of breeding values for mean and dispersion, their variance and correlation using double hierarchical generalized linear models. Genetics Research. ,vol. 94, pp. 307- 317 ,(2012) , 10.1017/S0016672312000766
Sibylle Sturtz, Uwe Ligges, Andrew Gelman, R2WinBUGS: A Package for Running WinBUGS from R Journal of Statistical Software. ,vol. 12, pp. 1- 16 ,(2005) , 10.18637/JSS.V012.I03
Denis Réale, Dany Garant, Murray M. Humphries, Patrick Bergeron, Vincent Careau, Pierre-Olivier Montiglio, Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. ,vol. 365, pp. 4051- 4063 ,(2010) , 10.1098/RSTB.2010.0208
David F. Westneat, Matthew Schofield, Jonathan Wright, Parental behavior exhibits among-individual variance, plasticity, and heterogeneous residual variance Behavioral Ecology. ,vol. 24, pp. 598- 604 ,(2013) , 10.1093/BEHECO/ARS207
STEVEN T. KALINOWSKI, MARK L. TAPER, TRISTAN C. MARSHALL, Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology. ,vol. 16, pp. 1099- 1106 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1365-294X.2007.03089.X
Massimo Pigliucci, Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 20, pp. 481- 486 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.TREE.2005.06.001
D. H. NUSSEY, A. J. WILSON, J. E. BROMMER, The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. ,vol. 20, pp. 831- 844 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1420-9101.2007.01300.X
Daniel T. Blumstein, Tina W. Wey, Karisa Tang, A test of the social cohesion hypothesis: interactive female marmots remain at home Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. ,vol. 276, pp. 3007- 3012 ,(2009) , 10.1098/RSPB.2009.0703
WILLIAM G. HILL, HAN A. MULDER, Genetic analysis of environmental variation. Genetics Research. ,vol. 92, pp. 381- 395 ,(2010) , 10.1017/S0016672310000546