Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation

作者: Stefan Woltran , Wolfgang Dvořák , Matti Järvisalo , Johannes Peter Wallner

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs) provide the basis for various reason- ing problems in area of Artificial Intelligence. Efficient evaluation AFs has thus been identified as an important research challenge. So far, implemented sys- tems evaluating have either followed a straight-forward reduction-based approach or limited to certain tractable classes AFs. In this work, we present generic reasoning over AFs, based on novel concept complexity-sensitivity. Establishing theoretical foundations approach, derive several new complexity results preferred, semi-stable and stage se- mantics which complement current landscape abstract argu- mentation, providing further understanding sources intractability AF problems. The introduced framework exploits decision proce- dures lower whenever possible. This allows, par- ticular, instantiations via harnessing iterative way sophisticated Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solver technology solving considered First experimental show that SAT-based instantiation our outperforms existing systems.

参考文章(67)
Sanjay Modgil, Martin Caminada, Proof Theories and Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks Applied Artificial Intelligence. pp. 105- 129 ,(2009) , 10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_6
Ringo Baumann, Gerhard Brewka, Wolfgang Dvořák, Stefan Woltran, Parameterized splitting: a simple modification-based approach Correct Reasoning. pp. 57- 71 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-3-642-30743-0_5
Leila Amgoud, Caroline Devred, Argumentation frameworks as constraint satisfaction problems scalable uncertainty management. ,vol. 6929, pp. 110- 122 ,(2011) , 10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_10
Stefan Woltran, Uwe Egly, Reasoning in Argumentation Frameworks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas computational models of argument. pp. 133- 144 ,(2006)
Ringo Baumann, Gerhard Brewka, Renata Wong, Splitting Argumentation Frameworks: An Empirical Evaluation Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation. pp. 17- 31 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_2
Mikoláš Janota, Joao Marques-Silva, Abstraction-based algorithm for 2QBF theory and applications of satisfiability testing. pp. 230- 244 ,(2011) , 10.1007/978-3-642-21581-0_19
Roberto Sebastiani, Lazy Satisfiability Modulo Theories Journal on Satisfiability, Boolean Modeling and Computation. ,vol. 3, pp. 141- 224 ,(2007) , 10.3233/SAT190034
Mauro Vallati, Massimiliano Giacomin, Marina Zanella, Federico Cerutti, A SCC recursive meta-algorithm for computing preferred labellings in abstract argumentation principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. pp. 42- 51 ,(2014)
Paul E. Dunne, Katie Atkinson, Samer Nofal, On Preferred Extension Enumeration in Abstract Argumentation computational models of argument. pp. 205- 216 ,(2012)
Ronald de Haan, Stefan Szeider, Fixed-Parameter Tractable Reductions to SAT theory and applications of satisfiability testing. pp. 85- 102 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-3-319-09284-3_8