Harmonization: the Sample, the Measurement, and the Report

作者: W. Greg Miller , Jillian R. Tate , Julian H. Barth , Graham R. D. Jones

DOI: 10.3343/ALM.2014.34.3.187

关键词:

摘要: Harmonization of clinical laboratory results means that are comparable irrespective the measurement procedure used and where or when a was made. test includes consideration pre-analytical, analytical, post-analytical aspects. Progress has been made in each these aspects, but there is currently poor coordination effort among different professional organizations countries. Pre-analytical considerations include terminology for order, instructions preparation patient, collection samples, handling transportation samples to laboratory. Key analytical calibration traceability reference system, commutability materials scheme, specificity biomolecule interest. International addressing harmonization Federation Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Medicine, World Health Organization, recently formed Consortium Results (ICHCLR). The ICHCLR will provide prioritization process measurands service coordinate global activities avoid duplication effort. Post-analytical nomenclature, units, significant figures, intervals decision values results. all areas necessary optimal service. This review summarizes status describes underway achieve goal fully harmonized testing.

参考文章(38)
Kenneth Sikaris, Janice Gill, Graham Rd Jones, ‘Allowable Limits of Performance’ for External Quality Assurance Programs – an Approach to Application of the Stockholm Criteria by the RCPA Quality Assurance Programs The Clinical biochemist. Reviews / Australian Association of Clinical Biochemists. ,vol. 33, pp. 133- 139 ,(2012)
Jill Tate, Ken Robertson, Antony Barker, Graham R D Jones, Chen-Fee Lim, The case for common reference intervals. The Clinical biochemist. Reviews / Australian Association of Clinical Biochemists. ,vol. 25, pp. 99- 104 ,(2004)
Ken Sikaris, Application of the stockholm hierarchy to defining the quality of reference intervals and clinical decision limits. The Clinical biochemist. Reviews / Australian Association of Clinical Biochemists. ,vol. 33, pp. 141- 148 ,(2012)
Graham H White, Basics of estimating measurement uncertainty. The Clinical biochemist. Reviews / Australian Association of Clinical Biochemists. ,vol. 29, ,(2008)
[edited by] Carl A. Burtis, Edward R. Ashwood, David E. Bruns, Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics ,(2011)
Hubert W Vesper, Gary L Myers, W Gregory Miller, Reference materials and commutability. The Clinical biochemist. Reviews / Australian Association of Clinical Biochemists. ,vol. 28, pp. 139- 147 ,(2007)
Graham Rd Jones, Laboratory Reporting of Urine Protein and Albumin The Clinical biochemist. Reviews / Australian Association of Clinical Biochemists. ,vol. 32, pp. 103- 107 ,(2011)
Charles F Fasce, Robert Rej, William H Copeland, Raymond E Vanderlinde, A Discussion of Enzyme Reference Materials: Applications and Specifications Clinical Chemistry. ,vol. 19, pp. 5- 9 ,(1973) , 10.1093/CLINCHEM/19.1.5
Ingrid Zegers, Thomas Keller, Wiebke Schreiber, Joanna Sheldon, Riccardo Albertini, Søren Blirup-Jensen, Myron Johnson, Stefanie Trapmann, Hendrik Emons, Giampaolo Merlini, Heinz Schimmel, Characterization of the New Serum Protein Reference Material ERM-DA470k/IFCC: Value Assignment by Immunoassay Clinical Chemistry. ,vol. 56, pp. 1880- 1888 ,(2010) , 10.1373/CLINCHEM.2010.148809