Testing small study effects in multivariate meta-analysis

作者: Chuan Hong , Georgia Salanti , Sally C. Morton , Richard D. Riley , Haitao Chu

DOI: 10.1111/BIOM.13342

关键词:

摘要: Small study effects occur when smaller studies show different, often larger, treatment than large ones, which may threaten the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The most well-known reasons for small include publication bias, outcome reporting clinical heterogeneity. Methods to account in univariate meta-analysis have been extensively studied. However, detecting a multivariate setting remains an untouched research area. One complications is that different types selection processes can be involved outcomes. For example, some completely unpublished while others selectively report multiple In this paper, we propose score test as overall meta-analysis. Two detailed case are given demonstrate advantage proposed over various naive applications tests practice. Through simulation studies, found retain nominal Type I error rates with considerable power moderate sample size settings. Finally, also evaluate concordance between application by evaluating 44 outcomes from Cochrane Database.

参考文章(30)
Jonathan A.C Sterne, Matthias Egger, Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 54, pp. 1046- 1055 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00377-8
Kung-Yee Liang, Steven G. Self, On the Asymptotic Behaviour of the Pseudolikelihood Ratio Test Statistic Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological). ,vol. 58, pp. 785- 796 ,(1996) , 10.1111/J.2517-6161.1996.TB02116.X
Daniel Yekutieli, Yoav Benjamini, THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY Annals of Statistics. ,vol. 29, pp. 1165- 1188 ,(2001) , 10.1214/AOS/1013699998
Colin B. Begg, Madhuchhanda Mazumdar, Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. ,vol. 50, pp. 1088- 1101 ,(1994) , 10.2307/2533446
J. Copas, K. Dwan, J. Kirkham, P. Williamson, A model-based correction for outcome reporting bias in meta-analysis Biostatistics. ,vol. 15, pp. 370- 383 ,(2014) , 10.1093/BIOSTATISTICS/KXT046
Gail Gong, Francisco J. Samaniego, Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Estimation: Theory and Applications Annals of Statistics. ,vol. 9, pp. 861- 869 ,(1981) , 10.1214/AOS/1176345526
Kerry Dwan, Carrol Gamble, Paula R Williamson, Jamie J Kirkham, Reporting Bias Group, None, Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review PLoS ONE. ,vol. 8, pp. e66844- ,(2013) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0066844
Paul-Christian Bürkner, Philipp Doebler, Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta‐analysis: a simulation study Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 33, pp. 3061- 3077 ,(2014) , 10.1002/SIM.6177
Roger M. Harbord, Matthias Egger, Jonathan A. C. Sterne, A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 25, pp. 3443- 3457 ,(2006) , 10.1002/SIM.2380