Justice, emotions, socially disruptive technologies

作者: Benedetta Giovanola , Benedetta Giovanola

DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2021.1893255

关键词:

摘要: … The post-Rawlsian debate on social justice has been characterised by a dispute between two competing approaches: luck egalitarianism (LE), which presents a responsibility-sensitive …

参考文章(25)
Richard J. Arneson, Egalitarianism and Responsibility The Journal of Ethics. ,vol. 3, pp. 225- 247 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1009874016786
Harry Brighouse, Ingrid Robeyns, Measuring Justice: List of contributors ,(2010) , 10.1017/CBO9780511810916
SAMUEL SCHEFFLER, What Is Egalitarianism Philosophy & Public Affairs. ,vol. 31, pp. 5- 39 ,(2003) , 10.1111/J.1088-4963.2003.00005.X
Michael J. Sandel, The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self Political Theory. ,vol. 12, pp. 81- 96 ,(1984) , 10.1177/0090591784012001005
JONATHAN WOLFF, Fairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos Philosophy <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&amp;"/> Public Affairs. ,vol. 27, pp. 97- 122 ,(1998) , 10.1111/J.1088-4963.1998.TB00063.X
Mitch Parsell, Pernicious virtual communities: Identity, polarisation and the Web 2.0 Ethics and Information Technology. ,vol. 10, pp. 41- 56 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S10676-008-9153-Y
Elizabeth S. Anderson, What Is the Point of Equality? Ethics. ,vol. 109, pp. 287- 337 ,(1999) , 10.1086/233897
Benedetta Giovanola, Personhood and Human Richness: Good and Well-Being in the Capability Approach and Beyond Review of Social Economy. ,vol. 63, pp. 249- 267 ,(2005) , 10.1080/00346760500130416