Effects of co-grazing dairy heifers with goats on animal performance, dry matter yield, and pasture forage composition.

作者: T. S. Dennis , L. J. Unruh-Snyder , M. K. Neary , T. D. Nennich

DOI: 10.2527/JAS.2011-4643

关键词:

摘要: Mixed livestock grazing can offer an alternative management system for rearing dairy replacement heifers (Bos taurus). A 2-yr study was conducted during 2009 (yr 1) and 2010 2) to deter- mine the effects of co-grazing Holstein under rotational stocking with Boer × Kiko goats on animal performance, pasture DM yield, botanical composi- tion. Each year, 24 (134 ± 6 d age 147.4 31.2 kg BW in yr 1; 166 11 168.0 27.6 (2 old 39.7 16.2 1 33.7 7.4 were divided into paddocks 4 2 goats, where applicable, per group. Low endophyte- infected tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) white clover (Trifolium repens L.) pastures used evaluate strategies (heifers grazed alone (HO) or co-grazed (HG)). In addi- tion, assigned (GO) each year estimate goat forage intake compare Haemonchus contortus infection goats. Forage samples taken monthly assess yield composition. Samples collected composition manually sort- ed grass, legume, weed species. DMI estimated using a rising plate meter before after grazing. Heifer at conclusion did not differ between HO HG (P = 0.40 P 0.12, respectively). Likewise, overall ADG dif- fer HG, averaging 0.65 kg/d 0.63 over both seasons 0.70). Grazing strat- egy affect total however, consumed 2.3 more than < 0.01), resulting greater 0.01). Heights hip withers 0.05). Weed presence strate- gies as determined by manual harvesting, but visual estimation tion end showed that had 3.5 times Within confi nes this study, heifer gain, it decreased DMI, suggesting be without negative feed effi ciency.

参考文章(40)
Robert A Isaac, William C Johnson, Elemental Analysis of Plant Tissue by Plasma Emission Spectroscopy: Collaborative Study Journal of AOAC International. ,vol. 68, pp. 499- 505 ,(1985) , 10.1093/JAOAC/68.3.499
R C Littell, P R Henry, C B Ammerman, Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 76, pp. 1216- 1231 ,(1998) , 10.2527/1998.7641216X
Ian Popay, Roger Field, Grazing animals as weed control agents. Weed Technology. ,vol. 10, pp. 217- 231 ,(1996) , 10.1017/S0890037X00045942
A J Heinrichs, W C Losinger, Growth of Holstein Dairy Heifers in the United States Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 76, pp. 1254- 1260 ,(1998) , 10.2527/1998.7651254X
F. M. Byers, A. L. Moxon, Protein and Selenium Levels for Growing and Finishing Beef Cattle Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 50, pp. 1136- 1144 ,(1980) , 10.2527/JAS1980.5061136X
A. O. Abaye, V. G. Allen, J. P. Fontenot, Influence of Grazing Cattle and Sheep Together and Separately on Animal Performance and Forage Quality Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 72, pp. 1013- 1022 ,(1994) , 10.2527/1994.7241013X
J M Lewis, T J Klopfenstein, R A Stock, Effects of rate of gain during winter on subsequent grazing and finishing performance. Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 68, pp. 2525- 2529 ,(1990) , 10.2527/1990.6882525X
Jorge Alberto Elizondo-Salazar, Estimación lineal de los requerimientos nutricionales del NRC para ganado de leche Agronomía Mesoamericana. ,vol. 13, pp. 41- 44 ,(2014) , 10.15517/AM.V13I1.13244
F.A. Martz, J. Gerrish, R. Belyea, V. Tate, Nutrient content, dry matter yield, and species composition of cool-season pasture with management-intensive grazing. Journal of Dairy Science. ,vol. 82, pp. 1538- 1544 ,(1999) , 10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(99)75381-6