Liquidity

作者: Richard G. Anderson , Jane M. Binner , Björn Hagströmer , Birger Nilsson

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802205-4.00012-9

关键词:

摘要: Empirical work investigating commonality in liquidity and systematic risk utilizes various different estimators of liquidity. This chapter is the first to compare contrast such estimators. We distinguish two classes that both have many followers literature: (1) weighted average based on concurrent shocks (2) principal components past shocks. Our results show simpler perform at least as well more complex finding robust across evaluation criteria underlying measures.

参考文章(40)
James J. Angel, Lawrence Harris, Chester S. Spatt, Equity Trading in the 21st Century Social Science Research Network. ,(2010) , 10.2139/SSRN.1584026
Joel Hasbrouck, Gideon Saar, Low-latency trading $ Journal of Financial Markets. ,vol. 16, pp. 646- 679 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.FINMAR.2013.05.003
T. S. BREUSCH, TESTING FOR AUTOCORRELATION IN DYNAMIC LINEAR MODELS Australian Economic Papers. ,vol. 17, pp. 334- 355 ,(1978) , 10.1111/J.1467-8454.1978.TB00635.X
Albert S. Kyle, Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading Econometrica. ,vol. 53, pp. 1315- 1335 ,(1985) , 10.2307/1913210
Albert J. Menkveld, High frequency trading and the new market makers Journal of Financial Markets. ,vol. 16, pp. 712- 740 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.FINMAR.2013.06.006
Jay F. Coughenour, Mohsen M. Saad, Common market makers and commonality in liquidity Journal of Financial Economics. ,vol. 73, pp. 37- 69 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.JFINECO.2003.05.006
James H Stock, Mark W Watson, Forecasting Using Principal Components From a Large Number of Predictors Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 97, pp. 1167- 1179 ,(2002) , 10.1198/016214502388618960