作者: Fabrizio Cafaggi , Andrea Renda
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: Over the past three decades, a growing number of national governments and international organizations have taken action to promote greater awareness in governments’ approach formulation, implementation revision legal rules. Smart regulation tools such as ex ante regulatory impact analysis (RIA) are being heavily sponsored internationally, coupled with promotion stakeholder consultation participatory decision-making, monitoring legislation, post evaluation.1 Guidance documents overarching principles on “how regulate” proliferated thanks work OECD, World Bank other organizations, including United States Office Information Regulatory Affairs European Commission, whose Impact Assessment Guidelines adopted reference by many EU non-EU countries.2 Moreover, need for risk-based inspections, well enhanced attention “cutting red tape” – i.e. reducing administrative burdens generated public legislation becoming firmly embedded patterns countries’ smart agenda.3 At same time, particular financial economic crisis that disrupted global economy since 2007, idea is undergoing thorough revisiting. Undoubtedly, besides an array disastrous consequences, has also created opportunities better understanding how markets (do not) work, can interact private players achieve policy goals more effectively. One consequences this trend “less more” philosophy dominated 1980s 1990s, mostly aimed at minimizing interference market forces, no longer dominant para-