The auction model with lower risk in duopolistic electricity market

作者: Estrella Alonso , Juan Tejada

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Este articulo modela la subasta del mercado electrico como un juego de dos jugadores informacion incompleta bajo las hipotesis empresas generadoras simetricas, neutrales al riesgo y con costes produccion independientes privados. En Alonso and Tejada (2010) se define una amplia familia parametrica modelos que contiene a los clasicos subasta: uniforme, discriminatorio Vickrey. el presente analiza mencionada desde punto vista riesgo. Se disena modelo nuevo llamara DV, cuyo es mas obtenido cualquiera

参考文章(16)
Glyn A. Holton, Value at Risk: Theory and Practice ,(2003)
Maarten C. W. Janssen, Emiel Maasland, Vladimir A. Karamychev, Simultaneous Pooled Auctions with Multiple Bids and Preference Lists Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. ,vol. 166, pp. 286- 298 ,(2010) , 10.1628/093245610791343049
Roger B. Myerson, Optimal Auction Design Mathematics of Operations Research. ,vol. 6, pp. 58- 73 ,(1981) , 10.1287/MOOR.6.1.58
Nils-Henrik Morch von der Fehr, David Harbord, SPOT MARKET COMPETITION IN THE UK ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY The Economic Journal. ,vol. 103, pp. 531- 546 ,(1993) , 10.2307/2234530
Marc S. Robinson, Collusion and the Choice of Auction The RAND Journal of Economics. ,vol. 16, pp. 141- 145 ,(1985) , 10.2307/2555595
Richard H Thaler, Anomalies: The Winner's Curse Journal of Economic Perspectives. ,vol. 2, pp. 191- 202 ,(1988) , 10.1257/JEP.2.1.191
Fernando Beltrán, Natalia Santamaría, A measure of the variability of revenue in auctions: A look at the revenue equivalence theorem Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences. ,vol. 2006, pp. 1- 14 ,(2006) , 10.1155/JAMDS/2006/27417
R.W. Ferrero, J.F. Rivera, S.M. Shahidehpour, Application of games with incomplete information for pricing electricity in deregulated power pools IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. ,vol. 13, pp. 184- 189 ,(1998) , 10.1109/59.651634
Natalia Fabra, Nils-Henrik Fehr, David Harbord, Designing electricity auctions The RAND Journal of Economics. ,vol. 37, pp. 23- 46 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1756-2171.2006.TB00002.X