Deciphering ecology from statistical artefacts: Competing influence of sample size, prevalence and habitat specialization on species distribution models and how small evaluation datasets can inflate metrics of performance

作者: Tyler A. Hallman , William D. Robinson

DOI: 10.1111/DDI.13030

关键词:

摘要: AIM: Sample size and species characteristics, including prevalence habitat specialization, can influence the predictive performance of distribution models (SDMs). There is little agreement, however, on which metric model to use. Here, we directly compare AUC partial ROC as metrics SDM through analyses effects traits sample performance. LOCATION: Three counties dominated by agricultural lands coniferous forest in Oregon's Willamette Valley Coast Range ecoregions. METHODS: We systematically reduced a large avian point count dataset alter sizes 22 songbird. used boosted regression trees run SDMs for each species, quantified mixed size, prevalence, specialization performance, calculated ROC, across species. with subset independent evaluation data separately more comprehensively investigate differences metrics. RESULTS: found positive quadratic effect strongly both weak no AUC. Contrary expectations, when evaluated data, was consistently highest smallest sizes. These small had correspondingly datasets. Partial or showed expected correlation between MAIN CONCLUSIONS: that datasets artificially inflate ROC. With literature recommended minimum low three, attention must be given

参考文章(43)
David García-Callejas, Miguel B. Araújo, The effects of model and data complexity on predictions from species distributions models Ecological Modelling. ,vol. 326, pp. 4- 12 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.ECOLMODEL.2015.06.002
André S. J. Proosdij, Marc S. M. Sosef, Jan J. Wieringa, Niels Raes, Minimum required number of specimen records to develop accurate species distribution models Ecography. ,vol. 39, pp. 542- 552 ,(2016) , 10.1111/ECOG.01509
Alison Johnston, Daniel Fink, Mark D. Reynolds, Wesley M. Hochachka, Brian L. Sullivan, Nicholas E. Bruns, Eric Hallstein, Matt S. Merrifield, Sandi Matsumoto, Steve Kelling, Abundance models improve spatial and temporal prioritization of conservation resources. Ecological Applications. ,vol. 25, pp. 1749- 1756 ,(2015) , 10.1890/14-1826.1
Eric P. Smith, Niche Breadth, Resource Availability, and Inference Ecology. ,vol. 63, pp. 1675- 1681 ,(1982) , 10.2307/1940109
Chuanbo Guo, Sovan Lek, Shaowen Ye, Wei Li, Jiashou Liu, Zhongjie Li, None, Uncertainty in ensemble modelling of large-scale species distribution: Effects from species characteristics and model techniques Ecological Modelling. ,vol. 306, pp. 67- 75 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ECOLMODEL.2014.08.002
S. M. Shirley, Z. Yang, R. A. Hutchinson, J. D. Alexander, K. McGarigal, M. G. Betts, Species distribution modelling for the people: unclassified landsat TM imagery predicts bird occurrence at fine resolutions Diversity and Distributions. ,vol. 19, pp. 855- 866 ,(2013) , 10.1111/DDI.12093
A. Townsend Peterson, Monica Papeş, Jorge Soberón, Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling Ecological Modelling. ,vol. 213, pp. 63- 72 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.ECOLMODEL.2007.11.008
Janet Franklin, Species distribution models in conservation biogeography: developments and challenges Diversity and Distributions. ,vol. 19, pp. 1217- 1223 ,(2013) , 10.1111/DDI.12125
Antoine Guisan, Catherine H Graham, Jane Elith, Falk Huettmann, NCEAS Species Distribution Modelling Group, None, Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size Diversity and Distributions. ,vol. 13, pp. 332- 340 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1472-4642.2007.00342.X