Common contact sensitizers in Delhi.

作者: Vivek Singhal , Belum Siva Nagi Reddy

DOI: 10.1111/J.1346-8138.2000.TB02202.X

关键词:

摘要: Seventy-five patients of both sexes with clinically suspected contact dermatitis were patch tested the Indian Standard Series and indigenous antigens. The results compared data from other centers. Most these young adults between 20 39 yrs old mean age 36.63 +/- 5.6 yrs. Their occupational profiles included household workers (17.33%), masons (10.66%), farmers (6.66%), factory (4%), medical personnel lab (2.66%), miscellaneous (17.33%). Itching burning two most common complaints, chronic was predominant morphologic pattern lesions observed. Frequent sites involved hands (40.83%), airborne type (22.44%), feet (12.24%), face (10.2%), neck (2.04%). Patch test analysis revealed that, out 75 subjects tested, 49 (65.3%) reacted to one or more allergens. Parthenium (20%) is sensitizer followed by potassium dichromate (16%), xanthium (13.33%), nickel sulphate (12%), chrysanthemum (8%), mercaptobenzothiazole, garlic (6.66% each). These findings are in broad conformity those reports. We concluded that antigens addition a few (such as garlic, onion chlorheximide local relevance) suitable for detecting allergens responsible prevailing this region.

参考文章(14)
D. L. Holness, J. R. Nethercott, R. M. Adams, D. Belsito, V. Deleo, E. A. Emmett, J. Fowler, A. A. Fisher, W. G. Larsen, H. I. Maibach, J. Marks, R. L. Reitschel, L. E. Rosenthal, W. F. Schorr, F. J. Storrs, J. S. Taylor, Concomitant positive patch test results with standard screening tray in North America 1985–1989 Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 32, pp. 289- 292 ,(1995) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1995.TB00783.X
Xue Min Wang, Yin Fen Lin, Xia Feng Cheng, Yan Pin Zhang, Mei Li Ye, Patch testing with the European standard series in Shanghai. Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 30, pp. 173- 174 ,(1994) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1994.TB00701.X
Syamalendra M. Sinha, Vegetables responsible for contact dermatitis of the hands. Archives of Dermatology. ,vol. 113, pp. 776- 779 ,(1977) , 10.1001/ARCHDERM.1977.01640060072007
James R. Nethercott, Results of routine patch testing of 200 patients in Toronto, Canada* Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 8, pp. 389- 395 ,(1982) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1982.TB04264.X
Daniel J. Hogan, Monica Hill, Peter R. Lane, Results of routine patch testing of 542 patients in Saskatoon, Canada Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 19, pp. 120- 124 ,(1988) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1988.TB05508.X
ANTHONY F. FRANSWAY, Epicutaneous Patch Testing: Current Trends and Controversial Topics Mayo Clinic Proceedings. ,vol. 64, pp. 415- 423 ,(1989) , 10.1016/S0025-6196(12)65731-0
E. Paulsen, K. E. Andersen, B. M. Hausen, Compositae dermatitis in a Danish dermatology department in one year Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 29, pp. 6- 10 ,(1993) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1993.TB04528.X
J. T. E. Leok, C. L. Goh, S. K. Ng, W. K. Wong, Changing trends in the epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 26, pp. 321- 326 ,(1992) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1992.TB00127.X
C. L Goh, Prevalence of contact allergy by sex, race and age Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 14, pp. 237- 240 ,(1986) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1986.TB01232.X