Law, Normativity, and the Writing. Oracle Night and Human Indeterminacy

作者: Massimo Durante

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6314-2_8

关键词:

摘要: Both legal and technological normativity may be understood as a set of constraining affordances, that is, constraints both delimit afford range possibilities. Those affordances can either semantic (legal normativity) or operational (technological normativity). So, the issue at stake is how such deal with crucial question human indeterminacy: namely, construction knowledge mediates between us world leaves room for behavior creative response to normativity. The aim paper investigate conditions possibility this response, which entails self-construction, whose narration we cannot, however, entirely accomplish by ourselves: it depends on relation others fundamental freedom self-expression circulation information.

参考文章(27)
Paul P. Gilbert, Metafisica e "funzione meta" Giornale di Metafisica: revista bimestrale di filosofia. ,vol. 32, pp. 529- 551 ,(2010)
Serge Gutwirth, Mireille Hildebrandt, Profiling the European Citizen: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated. ,(2008)
Stanislas Breton, Poétique du sensible Editions du CERF. ,(1988)
LUCIANO FLORIDI, A DEFENCE OF CONSTRUCTIONISM: PHILOSOPHY AS CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING Metaphilosophy. ,vol. 42, pp. 282- 304 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1467-9973.2011.01693.X
Mireille Hildebrandt, Law, Human Agency and Autonomic Computing Law, Human Agency and Autonomic Computing. pp. 141- 160 ,(2011) , 10.4324/9780203828342
Massimo Durante, Normativity, Constructionism, and Constraining Affordances EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste. ,(2011)
Stanley Fish, Rafael Eugenio Hoyos-Andrade, Is there a text in this class ALFA: Revista de Linguística. ,vol. 36, ,(1992)
Anind K. Dey, Understanding and Using Context ubiquitous computing. ,vol. 5, pp. 4- 7 ,(2001) , 10.1007/S007790170019