The Two Camps on Rationality

作者: Helmut Jungermann

DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62194-9

关键词:

摘要: Publisher Summary Rationality is not a genuine term of scientific psychology but rather concept philosophy and economics. The most common relevant definition says that an action rational if it in line with the values beliefs individual concerned; or more precisely, logical consistent as stated set axioms. This specifies behavior normatively. Empirical research can study whether actual human sense obeys norm. chapter distinguishes two camps, one points to deficiency argues for efficiency judgment decision. members first camp—pessimists—claim decision making under uncertainty often show systematic serious errors because in-built characteristics cognitive system. optimists other camp claim are highly efficient functional even complex situations.

参考文章(33)
Gordon F. Pitz, Decision Making and Cognition Decision Making and Change in Human Affairs. pp. 403- 424 ,(1977) , 10.1007/978-94-010-1276-8_26
Lawrence D. Phillips, A Theoretical Perspective on Heuristics and Biases in Probabilistic Thinking Advances in Psychology. ,vol. 14, pp. 525- 543 ,(1983) , 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62256-6
Baruch Fischhoff, Bernard Goitein, Zur Shapira, The Experienced Utility of Expected Utility Approaches Defense Technical Information Center. ,(1980) , 10.21236/ADA088698
James G. March, Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice The Bell Journal of Economics. ,vol. 9, pp. 587- 608 ,(1978) , 10.1017/CBO9780511598951.004
Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, On the study of statistical intuitions Cognition. ,vol. 11, pp. 123- 141 ,(1982) , 10.1016/0010-0277(82)90022-1
Cameron R. Peterson, Lee Roy Beach, Man as an intuitive statistician. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 68, pp. 29- 46 ,(1967) , 10.1037/H0024722
Daniel W. McAllister, Terence R. Mitchell, Lee Roy Beach, The contingency model for the selection of decision strategies: An empirical test of the effects of significance, accountability, and reversibility Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. ,vol. 24, pp. 228- 244 ,(1979) , 10.1016/0030-5073(79)90027-8