Discharge petitions and the conditional nature of agenda control in the U.S. House of Representatives

作者: Susan M Miller , L. Marvin Overby

DOI: 10.1177/1354068811436058

关键词:

摘要: While complementary in many ways, the cartel and conditional party government (CPG) theories of legislative power have disparate expectations for stability majority party’s negative agenda control. Cartel theorists contend that control is relatively constant over time, while CPG proponents suggest this type veto varies with intra-party preference cohesion inter-party distinction. In article, we enter debate by considering an alternative under-explored indicator control: participation discharge petition efforts. Our findings demonstrate instability ability to efforts, (co)sponsors showing a significantly greater likelihood ‘waffling’ during periods stronger unity more vigorous leadership power.

参考文章(17)
SUSAN M. MILLER, L. MARVIN OVERBY, Parties, Preferences, and Petitions: Discharge Behavior in the Modern House Legislative Studies Quarterly. ,vol. 35, pp. 187- 209 ,(2010) , 10.3162/036298010791170141
John H. Aldrich, Why parties? : the origin and transformation of political parties in America The Journal of American History. ,vol. 83, pp. 184- ,(1995) , 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226012773.001.0001
Kathryn Pearson, Eric Schickler, Discharge Petitions, Agenda Control, and the Congressional Committee System, 1929–76 The Journal of Politics. ,vol. 71, pp. 1238- 1256 ,(2009) , 10.1017/S0022381609990259
Keith Krehbiel, Cosponsors and Wafflers from A to Z American Journal of Political Science. ,vol. 39, pp. 906- ,(1995) , 10.2307/2111662
Keith Krehbiel, The Party Effect from A to Z and Beyond The Journal of Politics. ,vol. 61, pp. 832- 840 ,(1999) , 10.2307/2647831
Andrew D. Martin, Christina Wolbrecht, Partisanship and Pre-Floor Behavior: The Equal Rights and School Prayer Amendments Political Research Quarterly. ,vol. 53, pp. 711- 730 ,(2000) , 10.1177/106591290005300402
Sarah A. Binder, Eric D. Lawrence, Forrest Maltzman, Uncovering the Hidden Effect of Party The Journal of Politics. ,vol. 61, pp. 815- 831 ,(1999) , 10.2307/2647830
ERIC SCHICKLER, KATHRYN PEARSON, Agenda Control, Majority Party Power, and the House Committee on Rules, 1937–52 Legislative Studies Quarterly. ,vol. 34, pp. 455- 491 ,(2009) , 10.3162/036298009789869718
Keith Krehbiel, Where's the Party? British Journal of Political Science. ,vol. 23, pp. 235- 266 ,(1993) , 10.1017/S0007123400009741