Does the social equitability of community and incentive based conservation interventions in non-OECD countries, affect human well-being? A systematic review protocol

摘要: An increasing number of conservation interventions aim to reduce their negative impacts on vulnerable people and provide incentives aimed at improving overall human well-being. Community incentive based have had variable rates success in producing well-being outcomes, yet it is unclear why. Researchers hypothesised that socially equitable will improve likelihood success. However, for community interventions, there a lack evidence synthesis the effect social equity has outcomes. Using this protocol, we undertake systematic review relevant literature with using existing knowledge address gap. This protocol outlines methodology use examine research question: Does equitability non-OECD countries, affect well-being? We conduct available studies, articles measure equity, defined as absence avoidable unfair, cost benefit distributions between stratifying factors. To make process efficient, order prevent replication, utilize update search, sub-set data, collected previous map assessed quantity strength support effects wellbeing. critically appraise each study identify capture degree which integrated within project participation Where integrated, determine if studies record or describe developed conceptual framework describes expected understand these effects. relationships our framework, where data availability allows, combine series qualitative quantitative syntheses. By undertaking study, intend how considerations, specifically can A better understanding features inform practitioners researchers extent they ought incorporate into promote