Six: Structuring Inequality: How California Selectively Tests, Classifies, and Tracks Language Minority Students

作者: Min Zhou , Yang Sao Xiong

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: STRUCTURING INEQUITY: HOW CALIFORNIA SELECTIVELY TESTS, CLASSIFIES, AND TRACKS LANGUAGE MINORITY STUDENTS Yang Sao Xiong, Doctoral Student, Department of Sociology, UCLA Min Zhou, Professor, Departments Sociology and Asian American Studies, “Today, education is…a principal instrument in awakening the child to cultural values, preparing him (her) for later professional training, helping adjust normally his environment. In these days, it is doubtful that any may reasonably be expected succeed life if he (she) denied opportunity an education.” U.S. Supreme Court, 1954, Brown vs. Board Education “These reforms express my deep belief our public schools their mission build mind character every child, from background, part America.” President George W. Bush on No Child Left Behind, January 2001 1 Since Court’s decision school desegregation more than half a century ago, its political leaders, educators, other professionals have held high firm democratic ideal equal opportunity, believing best way ensure enable all children, regardless race, class, national origin backgrounds, (Rothstein, 2004). Past recent research has repeatedly shown levels are strongly related earnings having diploma barely enough secure well-paying job. For example, Bureau Labor Statistics recently reported full-time adult workers with less had median weekly $401 2004, compared $574 graduates without college $916 holding at least bachelor’s degree. 2 However, after decades educational reform, achievement gap between non- Hispanic white students racial or immigrant minority been persistently large. A student’s race family socioeconomic status (SES) continued serve as most reliable predictors her outcomes. Race class often interact affect access achievement. Existing become severe disproportionately numbers low-income students. Students who cannot read write English greater likelihood dropping out they face lifetime diminished opportunity. 19 states exit exams,

参考文章(28)
Geoffrey Nunberg, James Crawford, Language loyalties : a source book on the official English controversy University of Chicago Press. ,(1992)
Christine Rossell, Keith Baker, Selecting and Exiting Students in Bilingual Educational Programs. The Journal of Law of Education. ,vol. 17, pp. 589- 623 ,(1988)
Richard Rothstein, Class and schools : using social, economic, and educational reform to close the Black-white achievement gap Teachers College, Columbia University , Economic Policy Institute. ,(2004)
Robert Mason Hauser, Jay Philip Heubert, High stakes : testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20418 ($39.95 plus $4.50 for first copy, $0.95 for each additional copy). Tel: 888-624-8442 (Toll Free); Tel: 202-334-3313; Fax: 202-334-2451. For full text: http://www.nap.edu.. ,(1999)
Kevin Welner, Jeannie Oakes, (Li)Ability Grouping: The New Susceptibility of School Tracking Systems to Legal Challenges. Harvard Educational Review. ,vol. 66, pp. 451- 471 ,(1996) , 10.17763/HAER.66.3.P92775298646N342
Keith Baker, Christine Rossell, An Implementation Problem: Specifying the Target Group for Bilingual Education Educational Policy. ,vol. 1, pp. 249- 270 ,(1987) , 10.1177/0895904887001002006
David B. Grusky, Samuel Roundfield Lucas, Tracking Inequality: Stratification and Mobility in American High Schools Contemporary Sociology. ,vol. 30, pp. 574- ,(2001) , 10.2307/3088991
Chandra Muller, Kathryn S. Schiller, Leveling the Playing Field? Students' Educational Attainment and States' Performance Testing. Sociology Of Education. ,vol. 73, pp. 196- 218 ,(2000) , 10.2307/2673216
Alan C. Kerckhoff, Education and Social Stratification Processes in Comparative Perspective. Sociology Of Education. ,vol. 74, pp. 3- 18 ,(2001) , 10.2307/2673250