Regional assessment of the vulnerability of biotopes to landscape change

作者: Peter Weißhuhn

DOI: 10.1016/J.GECCO.2019.E00771

关键词:

摘要: Abstract To halt habitat loss, landscape planning and conservation management could benefit from a regional analysis of the spatially differing impacts caused by changes. These usually also differ according to specific vulnerability affected biotopes, i.e., characteristic assemblage plants animals on particular site. A map biotopes will determine those with high potential be adversely low capacity recover. The identification hot spots provide guidance for protection maintenance interventions. Following interdisciplinary concept, level (≈30,000 km2) was structured into biotope exposure, sensitivity, adaptive capacity. It involved patch group metrics describe terrestrial, (semi-) natural change. For 32 groups that were distinguished within this study, relative ranking is provided. At patches, spatial clusters thematic identified. dependent water availability, such as wet meadow, riparian habitat, peatland found particularly vulnerable. Moreover, herbaceous perennials, shrubland, groves, orchard meadows, several pristine forest types scored high, while majority patches less vulnerable index applied scale provided sound overview planning. Only few showed homogenous across their associated suggesting based local contexts needed biotopes.

参考文章(43)
Kevin McGarigal, Barbara J. Marks, FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service. ,vol. 351, pp. 122- ,(1995) , 10.2737/PNW-GTR-351
Gemma Bell, Samuel Neal, Katie Medcalf, Use of remote sensing to produce a habitat map of Norfolk Ecological Informatics. ,vol. 30, pp. 293- 299 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ECOINF.2015.06.003
Daniele Viciani, Lorella Dell'Olmo, Giulio Ferretti, Lorenzo Lazzaro, Lorenzo Lastrucci, Bruno Foggi, Detailed Natura 2000 and CORINE Biotopes habitat maps of the island of Elba (Tuscan Archipelago, Italy) Journal of Maps. ,vol. 12, pp. 492- 502 ,(2016) , 10.1080/17445647.2015.1044040
Robert H. MacArthur, Edward Osborne Wilson, The Theory of Island Biogeography ,(1967)
Sharon K. Collinge, Spatial ecology and biological conservation Biological Conservation. ,vol. 100, pp. 1- 2 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00201-9
Joern Fischer, David B. Lindenmayer, Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis Global Ecology and Biogeography. ,vol. 16, pp. 265- 280 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1466-8238.2007.00287.X
Jana Frélichová, David Vačkář, Adam Pártl, Blanka Loučková, Zuzana V. Harmáčková, Eliška Lorencová, Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic Ecosystem services. ,vol. 8, pp. 110- 117 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.ECOSER.2014.03.001
A. Ippolito, S. Sala, J.H. Faber, M. Vighi, Ecological vulnerability analysis: a river basin case study. Science of The Total Environment. ,vol. 408, pp. 3880- 3890 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2009.10.002
Peter J. Rousseeuw, Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. ,vol. 20, pp. 53- 65 ,(1987) , 10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7