Participatory Action Research and People with Disabilities: Principles and Challenges

作者: Fabricio E. Balcazar , Christopher B. Keys , Daniel L. Kaplan , Yolanda Suarez-Balcazar

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Running Head: Participatory Research Page 2 of 11 interests, and agendas for change. The process has been influenced by social research methods in critical education (e.g., Freire, 1970), anthropology Whyte, 1955), community development Falls Borda, 1984). Selener (1997) mentions that pioneers the PAR movement were dissatisfied with traditional positivistic methodology, which looked at people solely as subjects study, depriving them any input processoother than responding to researchersi questions. They also recognized two fundamental problems research: First, it did not give a voice under study. Second, was typically observational driven primarily theoretical interests little room action. These issues are central participatory emerged. need involve individuals study directly endeavor. they proposed focus should be generate actions aimed From this new perspective, is no longer limited sophisticated observation manipulation but includes attempts transform society empower those who oppressed. While focuses mostly on advancing knowledge, goals ofPAR include problem solving, agenda setting, change, addition membersi knowledge their own reality. .

参考文章(12)
Michelle Fine, Why Urban Adolescents Drop into and out of Public High School Teachers College Record. ,vol. 87, pp. 393- 409 ,(1986)
Budd L. Hall, Participatory Research, Popular Knowledge and Power: A Personal Reflection. Convergence: An International Journal of Adult Education. ,vol. 14, pp. 6- 19 ,(1981)
Yolanda Suarez-Balcazar, Fabricio E. Balcazar, Stephen B. Fawcett, Problem Identification in Social Intervention Research Methodological Issues in Applied Social Psychology. pp. 25- 42 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4899-2308-0_2
Susanne M. Bruyère, Participatory Action Research Overview and Implications for Family Members of Persons with Disabilities Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. ,vol. 3, pp. 62- 68 ,(1993) , 10.3233/JVR-1993-3213
Tom Seekins, Fabricio E. Balcazar, Vincent T. Francisco, Stephen B. Fawcett, R. Mark Mathews, The empowerment process in four advocacy organizations of people with disabilities Rehabilitation Psychology. ,vol. 39, pp. 189- 203 ,(1994) , 10.1037//0090-5550.39.3.189
Stephen B. Fawcett, Tom Seekins, Paula L. Whang, Charles Muiu, Yolanda Suarez de Balcazar, Creating and Using Social Technologies for Community Empowerment Prevention in human services. ,vol. 3, pp. 145- 171 ,(1984) , 10.1300/J293V03N02_08
William Foote Whyte, Participatory Action Research ,(1990)
Christopher Keys, Richard Wener, Organizational Intervention Issues A Four-Phase Approach to Post-Occupancy Evaluation Environment and Behavior. ,vol. 12, pp. 533- 540 ,(1980) , 10.1177/0013916580124009
Fabricio E. Balcazar, Tom Seekins, Stephen B. Fawcett, Bill L. Hopkins, Empowering people with physical disabilities through advocacy skills training. American Journal of Community Psychology. ,vol. 18, pp. 281- 296 ,(1990) , 10.1007/BF00931305