Enhancing the Application Efficiency of Life Cycle Assessment for Industrial Uses

作者: Gerald Rebitzer

DOI: 10.1065/LCA2005.11.005

关键词:

摘要: Sustainable development is an issue that gaining more and relevance in all areas of society, though specifically industry. In order to move towards the goal sustainability, life cycle thinking essential element. For implementation industry management (LCM) has been proposed as general concept. However, assessment environmental impacts with method assessment, which essentially only tool available for this purpose, limited industrial practice due involved complexity resulting necessary effort know-how. Therefore, thesis improved methods enhance application efficiency LCA uses. After a short introduction Chapter 1, new developments efficient assessments are presented 2 – both situations where pre-existing data studies, no or very information unit processes elementary flows exist. This concerns modeling based on reusable elements well limiting system boundaries by recommended cut-offs. Specific easy apply recommendations using cut-off rules proposed. 3 explores another path, namely usage models costing. A consistent framework economic sustainable tested. Essentially, one can conclude deployment systems approach underlying model extremely useful also conducting analyses, while causing little additional efforts. 4 elaborates case automotive component, service waste water treatment. Detailed results discussed, aforementioned regards "from scratch" relating costing tested demonstrated. The concludes some concise future research activities relation better related approaches.

参考文章(145)
David Hunkeler, Gerald Rebitzer, Allan Astrup Jensen, Manuele Margni, Life cycle management: Bridging the gap between science and application International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 6, pp. 384- 390 ,(2001) , 10.1007/BF02978870
Harm Christiaan Wilting, An energy perspective on economic activities s.n.. ,(1996)
Guido Sonnemann, Looking ahead to 2003 International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 8, pp. 48- 48 ,(2003) , 10.1007/BF02978748
Detlev Forst, Maximilian Kolb, Helmut Roßwag, Industrielle organische Chemie Chemie für Ingenieure. pp. 176- 198 ,(1993) , 10.1007/978-3-662-00654-2_12
Chris Hendrickson, Arpad Horvath, Satish Joshi, Lester Lave, Economic Input–Output Models for Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 32, ,(1998) , 10.1021/ES983471I
T Levitt, EXPLOIT THE PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW. ,vol. 43, pp. 81- 94 ,(1965)
Wolfram Scharnhorst, Annette Kohler, Gerald Rebitzer, Roland Hischier, Olivier Jolliet, Progress in modern life cycle assessment: practice and research International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 9, pp. 143- 151 ,(2004) , 10.1007/BF02994187
David Hunkeler, Ecometrics for life cycle management International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 4, pp. 291- 298 ,(1999) , 10.1007/BF02979182
G. Fleischer, G. Rebitzer, U. Schiller, W.-P. Schmidt, euroMat ‘97 - Tool for Environmental Life Cycle Design and Life Cycle Costing Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 107- 120 ,(1997) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-6381-5_9
Detlev Forst, Maximilian Kolb, Helmut Roßwag, Industrielle anorganische Chemie Chemie für Ingenieure. pp. 230- 254 ,(1993) , 10.1007/978-3-662-00654-2_15