Force-free motion of a cold plasma during the current quench

作者: D. I. Kiramov , B. N. Breizman

DOI: 10.1063/1.5046517

关键词:

摘要: Cold disruptive plasma tends to move during the current quench. Its motion is essentially force-free since quench timescale resistive rather than Alfvenic. In contrast hot vertical displacement events, frozen-in condition violated in cold case, and not governed by magnetic flux conservation but its dissipation. We present a numerical model of dynamics. This predicts electromagnetic loads on vacuum vessel, flow density evolution, centroid evolution. Our calculations include poloidal wall currents. demonstrate their significant contribution force acting vessel.Cold vessel.

参考文章(24)
Leonid E. Zakharov, Xujing Li, Tokamak magneto-hydrodynamics and reference magnetic coordinates for simulations of plasma disruptions Physics of Plasmas. ,vol. 22, pp. 062511- ,(2015) , 10.1063/1.4922896
H. R. Strauss, R. Paccagnella, J. Breslau, Wall forces produced during ITER disruptions Physics of Plasmas. ,vol. 17, pp. 082505- ,(2010) , 10.1063/1.3474922
E. M. Hollmann, P. B. Aleynikov, T. Fülöp, D. A. Humphreys, V. A. Izzo, M. Lehnen, V. E. Lukash, G. Papp, G. Pautasso, F. Saint-Laurent, J. A. Snipes, Status of research toward the ITER disruption mitigation system Physics of Plasmas. ,vol. 22, pp. 021802- ,(2015) , 10.1063/1.4901251
V M Leonov, V E Zhogolev, Simulation of high-Z impurity behaviour for ITER operational scenarios using the ZIMPUR impurity code Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. ,vol. 47, pp. 903- 918 ,(2005) , 10.1088/0741-3335/47/6/011
S. Miyamoto, A. Isayama, I. Bandyopadhyay, S.C. Jardin, R.R. Khayrutdinov, V.E. Lukash, Y. Kusama, M. Sugihara, Inter-code comparison benchmark between DINA and TSC for ITER disruption modelling Nuclear Fusion. ,vol. 54, pp. 083002- ,(2014) , 10.1088/0029-5515/54/8/083002
J.L Johnson, H.E Dalhed, J.M Greene, R.C Grimm, Y.Y Hsieh, S.C Jardin, J Manickam, M Okabayashi, R.G Storer, A.M.M Todd, D.E Voss, K.E Weimer, Numerical determination of axisymmetric toroidal magnetohydrodynamic equilibria Journal of Computational Physics. ,vol. 32, pp. 212- 234 ,(1979) , 10.1016/0021-9991(79)90129-3
M. Lehnen, A. Alonso, G. Arnoux, N. Baumgarten, S.A. Bozhenkov, S. Brezinsek, M. Brix, T. Eich, S.N. Gerasimov, A. Huber, S. Jachmich, U. Kruezi, P.D. Morgan, V.V. Plyusnin, C. Reux, V. Riccardo, G. Sergienko, M.F. Stamp, , Disruption mitigation by massive gas injection in JET Nuclear Fusion. ,vol. 51, pp. 123010- ,(2011) , 10.1088/0029-5515/51/12/123010
F. Villone, G. Ramogida, G. Rubinacci, Electromagnetic disruption analysis in IGNITOR Fusion Engineering and Design. ,vol. 93, pp. 57- 68 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.FUSENGDES.2015.02.044
S Putvinski, P Barabaschi, N Fujisawa, N Putvinskaya, M N Rosenbluth, J Wesley, Halo current, runaway electrons and disruption mitigation in ITER Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. ,vol. 39, ,(1997) , 10.1088/0741-3335/39/12B/013
M Lehnen, G Arnoux, N Hartmann, S Brezinsek, S Devaux, A Huber, S Jachmich, U Kruezi, GF Matthews, C Reux, V Riccardo, B Sieglin, MF Stamp, PC de Vries, JET EFDA Contributors, Disruption heat loads and their mitigation in JET with the ITER-like wall Journal of Nuclear Materials. ,vol. 438, ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2013.01.016