Dose-response analysis indicating time-dependent neurotoxicity caused by organic and inorganic mercury—Implications for toxic effects in the developing brain

作者: Julia Pletz , Francisco Sánchez-Bayo , Henk A. Tennekes

DOI: 10.1016/J.TOX.2016.02.006

关键词:

摘要: A latency period preceding neurotoxicity is a common characteristic in the dose-response relationship induced by organic mercury. Latency periods have typically been observed with genotoxicants carcinogenesis, cancer being manifested long time after initiating event. These observations indicate that even very small dose may cause extensive adverse effects later life, so toxicity of genotoxic compound and time-dependent. In children, methylmercury exposure during pregnancy (in utero) has associated delays reaching developmental milestones (e.g., age at first walking) decreases intelligence, increasing severity exposure. Ethylmercury from thimerosal some vaccines associated, studies, autism other neurological disorders children. this paper, we examined whether data vitro vivo mercury studies fit Druckrey-Kupfmuller equation c·t(n)=constant (c=exposure concentration, t=latency period), established for carcinogens, or not irreversible are enhanced (n≥1), else toxic dose-dependent while only minor influence on outcome (n<1). The mode action underlying time-dependent binding to critical receptors causing cumulative effects. results describes well characteristics neurotoxic This amounts paradigm shift chemical risk assessment mercurial compounds highlights it vital perform testing geared investigate

参考文章(49)
Rice Dc, Evidence for delayed neurotoxicity produced by methylmercury. Neurotoxicology. ,vol. 17, pp. 583- ,(1996)
Hanna Lohren, Lara Blagojevic, Romy Fitkau, Franziska Ebert, Stefan Schildknecht, Marcel Leist, Tanja Schwerdtle, Toxicity of organic and inorganic mercury species in differentiated human neurons and human astrocytes Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 32, pp. 200- 208 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JTEMB.2015.06.008
Christopher D. Wren, A review of metal accumulation and toxicity in wild mammals: I. Mercury Environmental Research. ,vol. 40, pp. 210- 244 ,(1986) , 10.1016/S0013-9351(86)80098-6
Pei I. Ho, Scott C. Collins, Sirikarnt Dhitavat, Daniela Ortiz, David Ashline, Eugene Rogers, Thomas B. Shea, Homocysteine potentiates β‐amyloid neurotoxicity: role of oxidative stress Journal of Neurochemistry. ,vol. 78, pp. 249- 253 ,(2001) , 10.1046/J.1471-4159.2001.00384.X
N O Nielsen, G Wobeser, B Schiefer, Mercury and Mink. II. Experimental methyl mercury intoxication. Canadian journal of comparative medicine. ,vol. 40, pp. 34- 45 ,(1976)
L. E. Kerper, N. Ballatori, T. W. Clarkson, Methylmercury transport across the blood-brain barrier by an amino acid carrier American Journal of Physiology-regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology. ,vol. 262, ,(1992) , 10.1152/AJPREGU.1992.262.5.R761
José G Dórea, Marcelo Farina, João BT Rocha, None, Toxicity of ethylmercury (and Thimerosal): a comparison with methylmercury Journal of Applied Toxicology. ,vol. 33, pp. 700- 711 ,(2013) , 10.1002/JAT.2855
James P.K. Rooney, The retention time of inorganic mercury in the brain--a systematic review of the evidence. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. ,vol. 274, pp. 425- 435 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.TAAP.2013.12.011
P M Rodier, Developing brain as a target of toxicity. Environmental Health Perspectives. ,vol. 103, pp. 73- 76 ,(1995) , 10.1289/EHP.95103S673