PopCORN: Hunting down the differences between binary population synthesis codes

作者: N. Mennekens , S.G.M. Toonen , A.J. Ruiter , J.S.W. Claeys

DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321576

关键词:

摘要: Context. Binary population synthesis (BPS) modelling is a very effective tool to study the evolution and properties of various types close binary systems. The uncertainty in parameters model their effect on can be tested statistical way, which then leads deeper understanding underlying (sometimes poorly understood) physical processes involved. Several BPS codes exist that have been developed with different philosophies aims. Although has successful for studies many populations stars, particular case progenitors supernovae Type Ia, predicted rates ZAMS vary substantially between codes. Aims. To understand predictive power codes, we similarities differences predictions four low- intermediate-mass binaries. We investigate characteristics populations, whether they are caused by assumptions made or numerical effects, e.g. lack accuracy Methods. compare large number evolutionary sequences starting same initial conditions following until first (and when applicable, second) white dwarf (WD) formed. simplify complex problem comparing based (often different) assumptions, equalise as much possible examine inherent Results. find simulated similar Regarding binaries one WD, there good agreement characteristics, channels lead birth these systems, birthrates. double WD population, create WDs rough population. progenitor systems single system do not, agree well. Most importantly, two from not due differences, but because assumptions. identify critical need studied more detail.

参考文章(119)
Andrew R. King, Mitchell C. Begelman, Radiatively Driven Outflows and Avoidance of Common-Envelope Evolution in Close Binaries The Astrophysical Journal. ,vol. 519, pp. L169- L171 ,(1999) , 10.1086/312126
Krzysztof Belczynski, Grzegorz Wiktorowicz, Chris L. Fryer, Daniel E. Holz, Vassiliki Kalogera, Missing Black Holes Unveil the Supernova Explosion Mechanism The Astrophysical Journal. ,vol. 757, pp. 91- ,(2012) , 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/91
G. Nelemans, S. F. Portegies Zwart, F. Verbunt, L. R. Yungelson, Population synthesis for double white dwarfs. II. Semi-detached systems: AM CVn stars Astronomy and Astrophysics. ,vol. 368, pp. 939- 949 ,(2001) , 10.1051/0004-6361:20010049
Ronald F. Webbink, Hongwei Ge, Xuefei Chen, Zhanwen Han, Michael S. Hjellming, Adiabatic Mass Loss in Binary Stars - I. Computational Method The Astrophysical Journal. ,vol. 717, pp. 724- 738 ,(2010) , 10.1088/0004-637X/717/2/724
L. R. Yungelson, A. V. Tutukov, M. Livio, The Formation of Binary and Single Nuclei of Planetary Nebulae The Astrophysical Journal. ,vol. 418, pp. 794- 803 ,(1993) , 10.1086/173436
Christian Knigge, Isabelle Baraffe, Joseph Patterson, THE EVOLUTION OF CATACLYSMIC VARIABLES AS REVEALED BY THEIR DONOR STARS The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. ,vol. 194, pp. 28- ,(2011) , 10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/28
Xiao-Jie Xu, Xiang-Dong Li, ON THE BINDING ENERGY PARAMETER λ OF COMMON ENVELOPE EVOLUTION The Astrophysical Journal. ,vol. 716, pp. 114- 121 ,(2010) , 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/114
R. F. Webbink, Double white dwarfs as progenitors of R Coronae Borealis stars and Type I supernovae The Astrophysical Journal. ,vol. 277, pp. 355- 360 ,(1984) , 10.1086/161701
H. Bondi, F. Hoyle, On the Mechanism of Accretion by Stars Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. ,vol. 104, pp. 273- 282 ,(1944) , 10.1093/MNRAS/104.5.273
Simon Portegies Zwart, Piet Baumgardt, Holger, Hut, Junichiro Makino, Steve McMillan, Formation of massive black holes through runaway collisions in dense young star clusters Nature. ,vol. 428, pp. 724- 726 ,(2004) , 10.1038/NATURE02448