摘要:
sci-hub.st 参考文章(134)
Leslie S. Kaplan, William A. Owings, The Politics of Teacher Quality: Implications for Principals. NASSP Bulletin. ,vol. 86, pp. 22- 41 ,(2002) , 10.1177/019263650208663303
Jonathan Supovitz, Philip Sirinides, Henry May, How Principals and Peers Influence Teaching and Learning Educational Administration Quarterly. ,vol. 46, pp. 31- 56 ,(2010) , 10.1177/1094670509353043
Carolyn D. Herrington, Barbara K. Wills, Decertifying the principalship: The politics of administrator preparation in Florida Educational Policy. ,vol. 19, pp. 181- 200 ,(2005) , 10.1177/0895904804271715
William L. Sanders, Sandra P. Horn, Research Findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) Database: Implications for Educational Evaluation and Research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education. ,vol. 12, pp. 247- 256 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1008067210518
Tim Taylor, Barbara N. Martin, Sandy Hutchinson, Michael Jinks, Examination of Leadership Practices of Principals Identified as Servant Leaders. International Journal of Leadership in Education. ,vol. 10, pp. 401- 419 ,(2007) , 10.1080/13603120701408262
Bob Witziers, Roel J. Bosker, Meta L. Krüger, Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association Educational Administration Quarterly. ,vol. 39, pp. 398- 425 ,(2003) , 10.1177/0013161X03253411
W. Norton Grubb, Joseph J. Flessa, "A Job Too Big for One": Multiple Principals and Other Nontraditional Approaches to School Leadership Educational Administration Quarterly. ,vol. 42, pp. 518- 550 ,(2006) , 10.1177/0013161X06290641
Ana M. Elfers, Margaret L. Plecki, Michael S. Knapp, Teacher Mobility: Looking More Closely at "The Movers" Within a State System Peabody Journal of Education. ,vol. 81, pp. 94- 127 ,(2006) , 10.1207/S15327930PJE8103_4
Kenneth Leithwood, Doris Jantzi, Linking Leadership to Student Learning: The Contributions of Leader Efficacy: Educational Administration Quarterly. ,vol. 44, pp. 496- 528 ,(2008) , 10.1177/0013161X08321501
Kenneth Leithwood, Characteristics of School Districts that Are Exceptionally Effective in Closing the Achievement Gap. Leadership and Policy in Schools. ,vol. 9, pp. 245- 291 ,(2010) , 10.1080/15700761003731500