作者: J. Silvain , F. Beygui , O. Barthelemy , C. Pollack , M. Cohen
DOI: 10.1136/BMJ.E553
关键词:
摘要: Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention. Design Systematic review meta-analysis. Data sources Medline Cochrane database systematic reviews, January 1996 to May 2011. Study selection Randomised non-randomised studies comparing intervention reporting on both mortality (efficacy end point) major bleeding (safety outcomes. extraction Sample size, characteristics, outcomes, extracted independently analysed. synthesis 23 trials representing 30 966 patients were identified, including 10 243 (33.1%) undergoing primary for ST elevation myocardial infarction, 8750 (28.2%) secondary after fibrinolysis, 11 973 (38.7%) non-ST acute syndrome or stable scheduled A total 13 943 (45.0%) received 17 023 (55.0%) heparin. Enoxaparin was associated significant reductions in death (relative risk 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.57 0.76; P Conclusion seems be superior reducing outcomes particularly infarction.