Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires.

作者: Margaret Grotle , Jens I Brox , Nina K Vøllestad , None

DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000149184.16509.73

关键词:

摘要: STUDY DESIGN A systematic literature review of outcome questionnaires designed for assessing functional status or disability in patients with low back pain. OBJECTIVES To provide a comprehensive overview all functioning/disability used recent years and to explore how the main concept(s) was described defined original paper, content domains disability, measurement properties questionnaires. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA number clinical tools evaluating pain have been developed. Only few reviewed earlier, there has little focus on reflected METHODS Papers including function, activity limitations, participation restrictions adult were searched MEDLINE CINAHL databases period from January 1996 2002. Two independent blinded researchers read selected abstracts The included classified according World Health Organization's International Classification Functioning, Disability Health. analyzed recommended guidelines. RESULTS total 36 back-specific identified. When distinguishing among bodily, personal, social perspective functioning, 4 types Most had mixed reflecting various constructs such as symptoms, sleep disturbances, psychological dysfunctions, physical impairments, functions. Nine assessed solely activities daily living. For one-third questionnaires, reported only study. CONCLUSIONS Although most their considerable variation respect concept found. can be considered acceptably validated.

参考文章(144)
J. Lautenschläger, W. Mau, T. Kohlmann, H. H. Raspe, F. Struve, W. Brückle, H. Zeidler, Vergleichende Evaluation einer deutschen Version des Health Assessment Questionnaires (HAQ) und des Funktionsfragebogens Hannover (FFbH) Zeitschrift Fur Rheumatologie. ,vol. 56, pp. 144- 155 ,(1997) , 10.1007/S003930050030
M H Pope, A H Adams, C Y Hsieh, R B Phillips, Functional outcomes of low back pain: comparison of four treatment groups in a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. ,vol. 15, pp. 4- 9 ,(1992)
Blotman F, Marty M, Valat Jp, Avouac B, Rozenberg S, VALIDATION OF THE FRENCH VERSION OF THE DALLAS PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE IN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN PATIENTS Revue du Rhumatisme. ,vol. 65, pp. 126- 134 ,(1998)
Fairbank J, Use of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Spine. ,vol. 20, pp. 1535- 1537 ,(1995)
Petzing K, Haas M, Jacobs Ge, Raphael R, Low back pain outcome measurement assessment in chiropractic teaching clinics: responsiveness and applicability of two functional disability questionnaires. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. ,vol. 18, pp. 79- 87 ,(1995)
R. Gunzburg, T. Keller, M. Szpalski, K. Vandeputte, K. Spratt, Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study. European Spine Journal. ,vol. 12, pp. 197- 204 ,(2003) , 10.1007/S00586-002-0479-6
Davies Jb, Fairbank Jc, O'Brien Jp, Couper J, The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire Physiotherapy. ,vol. 66, pp. 271- 273 ,(1980)
Carolyn M. Ruan, Andrew J. Haig, Michael E. Geisser, Karen Yamakawa, Rodney L. Buchholz, Functional capacity evaluations in persons with spinal disorders: predicting poor outcomes on the Functional Assessment Screening Test (FAST). Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. ,vol. 11, pp. 119- 132 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1016607419144
Steven Z. George, Julie M. Fritz, Richard E. Erhard, A comparison of fear-avoidance beliefs in patients with lumbar spine pain and cervical spine pain. Spine. ,vol. 26, pp. 2139- 2145 ,(2001) , 10.1097/00007632-200110010-00019