Use of weekly, low dose, high frequency ultrasound for hard to heal venous leg ulcers: the VenUS III randomised controlled trial

作者: J. M. Watson , A. R. Kang'ombe , M. O. Soares , L.-H. Chuang , G. Worthy

DOI: 10.1136/BMJ.D1092

关键词:

摘要: Objective To assess the clinical effectiveness of weekly delivery low dose, high frequency therapeutic ultrasound in conjunction with standard care for hard to heal venous leg ulcers. Design Multicentre, pragmatic, two arm randomised controlled trial. Setting Community and district nurse led services, community ulcer clinics, hospital outpatient clinics 12 urban rural settings (11 United Kingdom one Republic Ireland). Participants 337 patients at least >6 months’ duration or >5 cm2 area an ankle brachial pressure index ≥0.8. Interventions Weekly administration therapy (0.5 W/cm2, 1 MHz, pulsed pattern 1:4) up weeks plus compared alone. Main outcome measures Primary was time healing largest eligible ulcer. Secondary outcomes were proportion healed by months, percentage absolute change size, participants ulcer-free, health related quality life, adverse events. Results The groups showed no significant difference reference (log rank test, P=0.61). After adjustment baseline area, duration, use compression bandaging, study centre, there still evidence a (hazard ratio 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.70 1.40), P=0.97). median inestimable. There between all ulcers months (72/168 group v 78/169 group, P=0.39 Fisher’s exact test) nor size four treatment (model estimate 0.05 CI –0.09 0.19)). complete P=0.61), 328 days 235 inestimable) 365 (224 ultrasound. rates recurrence (17/31 14/31 care, P=0.68 test). both physical component score 0.69 (–1.79 3.08)) mental –0.93 (–3.30 1.44)), but significantly more events 0.30 (0.01 0.60)). relation 0.64 (0.55 0.75)) 0.59 (0.50 0.71)), larger older taking longer heal. In addition, those centres recruitment had highest rates. Conclusions Low administered during dressing changes addition did not increase rates, affect reduce recurrence. Trial registrationISRCTN21175670 National Research Register N0484162339

参考文章(26)
M J Callam, D R Harper, P N Berrey, J J Dale, C V Ruckley, Chronic ulcers of the leg: a study of prevalence in a Scottish community. Health bulletin. ,vol. 41, pp. 310- 314 ,(1983)
J LaBrecque, J Pribble, M B Etris, Evaluation of two wound measurement methods in a multi-center, controlled study. Ostomy Wound Management. ,vol. 40, pp. 44- 48 ,(1994)
Rachael Smithdale, Christine Moffatt, Ruth Martin, Leg Ulcer Management ,(2007)
Ali Akbari Sari, Kate Flemming, Nicky A Cullum, Uwe Wollina, Therapeutic ultrasound for pressure ulcers Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,(2006) , 10.1002/14651858.CD001275.PUB2
Nicky Cullum, Zhenmi Liu, None, Therapeutic ultrasound for venous leg ulcers Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 5, pp. 0- 0 ,(2017) , 10.1002/14651858.CD001180.PUB4
Susan O'Meara, Nicky Cullum, E Andrea Nelson, Jo C Dumville, Compression for venous leg ulcers Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 11, ,(2012) , 10.1002/14651858.CD000265.PUB3
Cynthia P Lglesias, Yvonne Birks, Elizabeth A Nelson, Elizabeth Scanlon, Nicky A Cullum, None, Quality of life of people with venous leg ulcers: A comparison of the discriminative and responsive characteristics of two generic and a disease specific instruments Quality of Life Research. ,vol. 14, pp. 1705- 1718 ,(2005) , 10.1007/S11136-005-2751-9
David E. Hapeman, Categorical Data Analysis Technometrics. ,vol. 33, pp. 241- 241 ,(1991) , 10.1080/00401706.1991.10484817
JC Dumville, G Worthy, MO Soares, JM Bland, N Cullum, C Dowson, C Iglesias, D McCaughan, JL Mitchell, EA Nelson, DJ Torgerson,, VenUS II: A randomised controlled trial of larval therapy in the management of leg ulcers Health Technology Assessment. ,vol. 13, pp. 1- 182 ,(2009) , 10.3310/HTA13550
JM Watson, AR Kang’ombe, MO Soares, L-H Chuang, G Worthy, JM Bland, C Iglesias, N Cullum, D Torgerson, EA Nelson, VenUS III: a randomised controlled trial of therapeutic ultrasound in the management of venous leg ulcers Health Technology Assessment. ,vol. 15, pp. 1- 192 ,(2011) , 10.3310/HTA15130