摘要: Many agents are conceived to achieve certain goals on behalf of their owners by interacting with other agents. In order make these behave so as not violate agent's rights (or, more uncontroversially: the agents), we have build into an attitude about such rights. To do this, need a language represent and reason The contribution this paper is offer formal informal arguments in favour employing notion when characterizing agent behaviour. A for analysing rights-relations between two proposed, sample analysis performed example which both relevant realistic.
springer.com
core.ac.uk
researchgate.net 
sci-hub.se 参考文章(43)
Jaakko Hintikka, Knowledge and belief ,(1962)
Geof Staniford, Multi-agent system design: using human societal metaphors and normative logic european conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 289- 293 ,(1994)
Hans-Dieter Burkhard, On fair controls in multi-agent systems european conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 254- 258 ,(1994)
Jeffrey S. Rosenschein, Consenting agents: negotiation mechanisms for multi-agent systems international joint conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 792- 799 ,(1993)
John McCarthy, What has AI in common with philosophy international joint conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 2041- 2042 ,(1995)
Christen Krogh, Obligations in Multiagent Systems. scandinavian conference on ai. pp. 19- 30 ,(1995)
Kei Matsubayashi, Mario Tokoro, A collaboration mechanism on positive interactions in multi-agent environments international joint conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 346- 351 ,(1993)
Diane Cook, Will Briggs, Flexible social laws international joint conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 688- 693 ,(1995)
Stig Kanger, New Foundations for Ethical Theory Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. pp. 36- 58 ,(1970) , 10.1007/978-94-010-3146-2_2
Marek Sergot, Andrew J. I. Jones, On the characterization of law and computer systems: the normative systems perspective deontic logic in computer science. pp. 275- 307 ,(1994)