Rebalancing the Rationing Debate: Tackling the Tensions Between Individual and Community Rights

作者: Christopher Newdick

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21112-1_11

关键词:

摘要: Health care is not just about the rights of individuals. It part a larger endeavour to secure optimum performance from finite funds for community patients and do so fairly, safely effectively. At time economic austerity, questions arise affordability. economists refer this as “opportunity cost” because choices commit particular purposes prevent those being available other purposes. Inevitably, that favour needs individuals (what I call “individualist” approach) tend disfavour communities “community” approach). My purpose discuss limitations approach rationing need clearer population-based objectives in health care. By itself, individualist equipped respond challenges presented by scarce resources, especially light increase chronic, “lifestyle” diseases. deny importance individual perspective but argue we rebalance debate.

参考文章(16)
Christopher Newdick, Citizenship, free movement and health care: Cementing individual rights by corroding social solidarity Common Market Law Review. ,vol. 43, pp. 1645- 1668 ,(2006)
C. Newdick, JUDICIAL REVIEW: LOW-PRIORITY TREATMENT AND EXCEPTIONAL CASE REVIEW Medical Law Review. ,vol. 15, pp. 236- 244 ,(2007) , 10.1093/MEDLAW/FWM008
Ann Barrett, Tom Roques, Matthew Small, Richard D Smith, How much will Herceptin really cost? BMJ. ,vol. 333, pp. 1118- 1120 ,(2006) , 10.1136/BMJ.39008.624051.BE
GWYN BEVAN, CHRISTOPHER HOOD, What's measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system Public Administration. ,vol. 84, pp. 517- 538 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1467-9299.2006.00600.X