A comparison of crayfish burrow morphologies: Triassic and Holocene fossil, paleo‐ and neo‐ichnological evidence, and the identification of their burrowing signatures

作者: Stephen T. Hasiotis , Charles E. Mitchell

DOI: 10.1080/10420949309380104

关键词:

摘要: The architectural and surficial morphologies of crayfish burrows from the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation Holocene sediments were compared in order to determine: 1) if could truly be attributed activity; 2) how comparable burrowing mechanisms are; 3) whether or not a common set signatures identified for both ancient modern freshwater crayfish. Materials used this study include members Formation, casts constructed by Procambarus clarkii Hobbs acutus (Girard) laboratory, naturally Cambarus diogenes di‐ogenes (Girard). burrow exhibit simple complex architectures, varying degrees branching, chamber, chimney development. They also relatively textured (bioglyphs) such as scrape scratch marks, mud‐ lag‐liners, knobby ...

参考文章(21)
John Harris Stewart, Forrest Graham Poole, Richard Farifield Wilson, R.A. Cadigan, William Thordarson, H.F. Albee, Stratigraphy and Origin of the Chinle Formation and Related Upper Triassic Strata in the Colorado Plateau Region Professional Paper. ,(1972) , 10.3133/PP690
Robert W. Frey, James D. Howard, Wayne A. Pryor, Ophiomorpha: Its morphologic, taxonomic, and environmental significance Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. ,vol. 23, pp. 199- 229 ,(1978) , 10.1016/0031-0182(78)90094-9
G. S. Carter, L. C. Beadle, Notes on the Habits and Development of Lepidosiren paradoxa Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. ,vol. 37, pp. 197- 203 ,(1930) , 10.1111/J.1096-3642.1930.TB02065.X
Horton Holcombe Hobbs (Jr.), The Crayfishes of Georgia Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. ,vol. 318, pp. 1- 549 ,(1981) , 10.5479/SI.00810282.318
PHJ Horwitz, AMM Richardson, An ecological classification of the burrows of Australian freshwater crayfish Marine and Freshwater Research. ,vol. 37, pp. 237- 242 ,(1986) , 10.1071/MF9860237