Quality evaluation in medical visualization: some issues and a taxonomy of methods

作者: Beatriz S. Santos , Jean-Louis Dillenseger

DOI: 10.1117/12.594549

关键词:

摘要: Among the several medical imaging stages (acquisition, reconstruction, etc.), visualization is latest stage on which decision generally taken. Scientific tools allow to process complex data into a graphical visible and understandable form, goal being provide new insight. If evaluation of procedures crucial issue main concern in medicine, paradoxically techniques, predominantly tri-dimensional imaging, have not been subject many studies. This perhaps due fact that integrates Human Visual Cognitive Systems, makes especially difficult. However, as question quality specific remains challenge. While few studies concerning cases already published, there still great need for definition systemization methodologies. The our study propose such framework, it possible take account all parameters taking part technique. Concerning problem general, particular, three different concepts appear be fundamental: type level components used convey user information contained data, at can performed, methodologies perform evaluation. We taxonomy involving types methods levels.

参考文章(60)
Jeffrey Lubin, The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance Digital images and human vision. pp. 163- 178 ,(1993)
Andreas Pommert, Karl Heinz Höhne, Evaluation of Image Quality in Medical Volume Visualization: The State of the Art medical image computing and computer assisted intervention. pp. 598- 605 ,(2002) , 10.1007/3-540-45787-9_75
Kevin Bowyer, Validation of Medical Image Analysis Techniques Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 2. Medical Image Processing and Analysis. pp. 567- 607 ,(2000) , 10.1117/3.831079.CH10
Haim Levkowitz, Ronald M. Pickett, Stuart Smith, Mark Torpey, An Environment and Studies for Exploring Auditory Representations of Multidimensional Data Perceptual Issues in Visualization. pp. 47- 58 ,(1995) , 10.1007/978-3-642-79057-7_5
Freek Reinders, Hans J. W. Spoelder, Frits H. Post, Experiments on the accuracy of feature extraction. Visualization in Scientific Computing. pp. 49- 58 ,(1998) , 10.1007/978-3-7091-7517-0_5
Peter L. Williams, Samuel P. Uselton, Marisa K. Chancellor, Foundations for Measuring Volume Rendering Quality ,(1997)
Al Globus, Sam Uselton, Evaluation of visualization software ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics. ,vol. 29, pp. 41- 44 ,(1995) , 10.1145/204362.204372
P. Jannin, J.M. Fitzpatrick, D.J. Hawkes, X. Pennec, R. Shahidl, M.W. Vannier, Validation of medical image processing in image-guided therapy IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. ,vol. 21, pp. 1445- 1449 ,(2002) , 10.1109/TMI.2002.806568
Michael W. Vannier, Charles F. Hildebolt, Louis A. Gilula, Thomas K. Pilgram, Frederick Mann, Barbara S. Monsees, William A. Murphy, William G. Totty, Carolyn J. Offutt, Calcaneal and pelvic fractures: diagnostic evaluation by three-dimensional computed tomography scans. Journal of Digital Imaging. ,vol. 4, pp. 143- 152 ,(1991) , 10.1007/BF03168159
WILLIAM STANFORD, WILLIAM E. ERKONEN, MARTIN D. CASSELL, BRIAN D. MORAN, GREGORY EASLEY, RANDY L. CARRIS, MARK A. ALBANESE, Evaluation of a Computer-Based Program for Teaching Cardiac Anatomy Investigative Radiology. ,vol. 29, pp. 248- 252 ,(1994) , 10.1097/00004424-199402000-00022