A general account of argumentation with preferences
作者： Sanjay Modgil , Henry Prakken
DOI: 10.1016/J.ARTINT.2012.10.008
关键词:
摘要: This paper builds on the recent ASPIC^+ formalism, to develop a general framework for argumentation with preferences. We motivate revised definition of conflict free sets arguments, adapt accommodate broader range instantiating logics, and show that under some assumptions, resulting satisfies key properties rationality postulates. then generalised accommodates Tarskian logic instantiations extended preferences, study by classical approaches argumentation. conclude arguing ASPIC^+@?s modelling defeasible inference rules further testifies generality framework, examine counter critiques Dung@?s its extensions
arxiv.org
core.ac.uk
acm.org
harvard.edu
sci-hub.se 参考文章(54)
Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol, Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks Journal of Automated Reasoning. ,vol. 29, pp. 125- 169 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1021603608656
Henry Prakken, Sanjay Modgil, Revisiting preferences and argumentation international joint conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 1021- 1026 ,(2011) , 10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-175
Philippe Besnard, Anthony Hunter, A logic-based theory of deductive arguments Artificial Intelligence. ,vol. 128, pp. 203- 235 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00071-6
John L. Pollock, Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person ,(1995)
Henry Prakken, Some Reflections on Two Current Trends in Formal Argumentation Logic Programs, Norms and Action. pp. 249- 272 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-3-642-29414-3_14
Sanjay Modgil, Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks Artificial Intelligence. ,vol. 173, pp. 901- 934 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ARTINT.2009.02.001
Paul E. Dunne, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, Two party immediate response disputes: properties and efficiency Artificial Intelligence. ,vol. 149, pp. 221- 250 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00076-6
Henry Prakken, Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semantics Artificial Intelligence and Law. ,vol. 20, pp. 57- 82 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S10506-012-9117-8
Henry Prakken, An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments Argument & Computation. ,vol. 1, pp. 93- 124 ,(2010) , 10.1080/19462160903564592
Martin Caminada, Leila Amgoud, On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms Artificial Intelligence. ,vol. 171, pp. 286- 310 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.ARTINT.2007.02.003