Automated generation of node-splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta-analysis.

作者: Gert Valkenhoef , Sofia Dias , A. E. Ades , Nicky J. Welton

DOI: 10.1002/JRSM.1167

关键词:

摘要: Network meta-analysis enables the simultaneous synthesis of a network clinical trials comparing any number treatments. Potential inconsistencies between estimates relative treatment effects are an important concern, and several methods to detect inconsistency have been proposed. This paper is concerned with node-splitting approach, which particularly attractive because its straightforward interpretation, contrasting from both direct indirect evidence. However, analyses labour-intensive each comparison interest requires separate model. It would be advantageous if models could estimated automatically for all comparisons interest. We present unambiguous decision rule choose split, prove that it selects only in potentially inconsistent loops network, investigated. Moreover, circumvents problems parameterisation multi-arm trials, ensuring model generation trivial cases. Thus, our eliminate most manual work involved using enabling analyst focus on interpreting results.

参考文章(26)
David J. Lunn, Andrew Thomas, Nicky Best, David Spiegelhalter, WinBUGS – A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility Statistics and Computing. ,vol. 10, pp. 325- 337 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1008929526011
Deborah M Caldwell, A E Ades, J P T Higgins, Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence BMJ. ,vol. 331, pp. 897- 900 ,(2005) , 10.1136/BMJ.331.7521.897
Guobing Lu, A. E Ades, Assessing evidence inconsistency in mixed treatment comparisons Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 101, pp. 447- 459 ,(2006) , 10.1198/016214505000001302
Ingram Olkin, Larry V. Hedges, Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis ,(1985)
Heiner C. Bucher, Gordon H. Guyatt, Lauren E. Griffith, Stephen D. Walter, The Results of Direct and Indirect Treatment Comparisons in Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 50, pp. 683- 691 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00049-8
Kirsty M. Rhodes, Rebecca M. Turner, Julian P.T. Higgins, Predictive distributions were developed for the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of continuous outcome data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 68, pp. 52- 60 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2014.08.012
J. P. T. Higgins, D Jackson, J. K. Barrett, G Lu, A. E. Ades, I. R. White, Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies Research Synthesis Methods. ,vol. 3, pp. 98- 110 ,(2012) , 10.1002/JRSM.1044
JULIAN P. T. HIGGINS, ANNE WHITEHEAD, Borrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 15, pp. 2733- 2749 ,(1996) , 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961230)15:24<2733::AID-SIM562>3.0.CO;2-0