Explaining Changing Suicide Rates in Norway 1948–2004: The Role of Social Integration

作者: Anders Barstad

DOI: 10.1007/S11205-007-9155-X

关键词:

摘要: Using Norway 1948–2004 as a case, I test whether changes in variables related to social integration can explain suicide rates. The method is the Box-Jenkins approach time-series analysis. Different aspects of family contribute significantly explanation Norwegian rates this period. estimated effect separations stronger than divorces, both for men and women, probably because are closer time “real” marital breakup. This difference has not been demonstrated earlier research. Marriages decrease males. unemployment estimate negative sign, contributing fewer suicides. Both increasing alcohol (beer) consumption marriages seem be implicated soaring rate young since 1970.

参考文章(70)
Hsiang-Ching Kung, Jane L. Pearson, Xinhua Liu, Risk factors for male and female suicide decedents ages 15-64 in the United States. Results from the 1993 National Mortality Followback Survey. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. ,vol. 38, pp. 419- 426 ,(2003) , 10.1007/S00127-003-0656-X
Bengt Starrin, A Pihl, Ekonomiska påfrestningar, socialt stöd och ohälsa : En prövning av ekonomi-sociala band modellen Socialmedicinsk tidskrift, 1998, 75, 6, 297-304. ,(1998)
Bijou Yang, The Economy and Suicide:. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. ,vol. 51, pp. 87- 99 ,(1992) , 10.1111/J.1536-7150.1992.TB02512.X
Stephen Platt, Keith Hawton, Suicidal Behaviour and the Labour Market The International Handbook of Suicide and Attempted Suicide. pp. 309- 384 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470698976.CH20
Gary Alan Fine, None, Interaction Ritual Chains ,(2004)
Martti Heikkinen, Hillevi Aro, Jouko Lönnqvist, Life events and social support in suicide. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior. ,vol. 23, pp. 343- 358 ,(1993) , 10.1111/J.1943-278X.1993.TB00204.X
John A Spaulding, George Simpson, Emile Durkheim, Suicide: A Study in Sociology ,(1897)
ARNE MASTEKAASA, Marital Dissolution and Subjective Distress: Panel Evidence European Sociological Review. ,vol. 11, pp. 173- 185 ,(1995) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.ESR.A036355