摘要: In theory, flawed arguments are not individually sufficient to justify a conclusion, but several may converge do so. This is an empirical study of how arguers respond series imperfect causal during serious conversation. People became less critical the as more appeared. The gives evidence that ordinary permit sufficiency accumulate extended discussion.
philpapers.org参考文章(4)
Richard E Petty, John T Cacioppo, Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change ,(2011)
Daniel J. O’Keefe, Potential Conflicts between Normatively-Responsible Advocacy and Successful Social Influence: Evidence from Persuasion Effects Research Argumentation. ,vol. 21, pp. 151- 163 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S10503-007-9046-Y
Liz Sonenberg, Iyad Rahwan, Frank Dignum, Philippe Pasquier, Argumentation and Persuasion in the Cognitive Coherence Theory computational models of argument. ,vol. 144, pp. 223- 234 ,(2006)
Richard E. Petty, John T. Cacioppo, The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ,vol. 46, pp. 69- 81 ,(1984) , 10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69