Allocation of Resources to Communication of Research Result Summaries: Biobank Participant Perspectives.

作者: Julie E. Richards , Emmi Bane , Stephanie M. Fullerton , Evette J. Ludman , Gail Jarvik

DOI: 10.1177/1556264616667126

关键词:

摘要: Researchers and policymakers recommend communicating summary research results to biobank participants when feasible. To date, however, there have been few explorations of participant preferences for dedicating resources this activity. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with a genetic medicine biobank. Participants interviewed by phone about their motivation participation, opinions the allocation results. De-identified transcripts used directed content analysis. Most participation was altruistic. All not only interested in receiving but also expressed clear preference allocating limited funds conducting additional research. The suggest that nuanced view returning results, asking opinion is valuable exercise. may benefit from transparency goals involving decisions return

参考文章(22)
Derick Mitchell, Jan Geissler, Alison Parry-Jones, Hans Keulen, Doris C. Schmitt, Rosaria Vavassori, Balwir Matharoo-Ball, Biobanking from the patient perspective. Research Involvement and Engagement. ,vol. 1, pp. 4- ,(2015) , 10.1186/S40900-015-0001-Z
A.A. Lemke, W.A. Wolf, J. Hebert-Beirne, M.E. Smith, Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics. ,vol. 13, pp. 368- 377 ,(2010) , 10.1159/000276767
Phoebe L. Bacon, Erin D. Harris, Sonja I. Ziniel, Sarah K. Savage, Elissa R. Weitzman, Robert C. Green, Noelle L. Huntington, Ingrid A. Holm, The Development of a Preference-Setting Model for the Return of Individual Genomic Research Results Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. ,vol. 10, pp. 107- 120 ,(2015) , 10.1177/1556264615572092
Laura M Beskow, Wylie Burke, Stephanie M Fullerton, Richard R Sharp, None, Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: opportunities and challenges. Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 14, pp. 490- 496 ,(2012) , 10.1038/GIM.2011.62
Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Julie M Bares, Gail P Jarvik, Eric B Larson, Wylie Burke, Genomic research and wide data sharing: Views of prospective participants Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 12, pp. 486- 495 ,(2010) , 10.1097/GIM.0B013E3181E38F9E
Monya Baker, Building better biobanks Nature. ,vol. 486, pp. 141- 146 ,(2012) , 10.1038/486141A
Mary Dixon-Woods, Clare Jackson, Kate C Windridge, Sara Kenyon, Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: qualitative study of participants' views BMJ. ,vol. 332, pp. 206- 210 ,(2006) , 10.1136/BMJ.38675.677963.3A
Beti Thompson, James R. Hébert, Involving Disparate Populations in Clinical Trials and Biobanking Protocols: Experiences from the Community Network Program Centers Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. ,vol. 23, pp. 370- 373 ,(2014) , 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0118
Ann H Partridge, Eric P Winer, Informing clinical trial participants about study results. JAMA. ,vol. 288, pp. 363- 365 ,(2002) , 10.1001/JAMA.288.3.363
Catherine A. McCarty, Ann Garber, Jonathan C. Reeser, Norman C. Fost, , Study newsletters, community and ethics advisory boards, and focus group discussions provide ongoing feedback for a large biobank. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. ,vol. 155, pp. 737- 741 ,(2011) , 10.1002/AJMG.A.33896