Reassessing the Effectiveness of Industrial Policy in Indonesia: Can the Neoliberals be Wrong?

作者: Michael T Rock

DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00158-2

关键词:

摘要: Abstract —The neoliberal interpretation of the Indonesian state suggests that industrial policy was incoherent, subject to rent-seeking, and irrelevant Indonesia's post-1966 development success. A more nuanced micro-historical analysis state's interventions demonstrates this oversimplification misses political elite objectives overcome “ ekonomi kolonial ” by using power selective intervention create a strong, integrated, diversified, outward-oriented economy (“ nasional ”). Empirical presented here Indonesia has largely achieved objective. It also been important than argument permits.

参考文章(46)
C. Peter Timmer, The Political Economy of Rice in Asia: Indonesia Food Research Institute Studies. ,vol. 14, pp. 1- 36 ,(1975)
R. Robison, Class, capital and the state in New Order Indonesia Robison, R. <http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/view/author/Robison, Richard.html> (1985) Class, capital and the state in New Order Indonesia. In: Higgott, R. and Robison, R., (eds.) Southeast Asia: essays in the political economy of structural change. Routledge & Kegan Paul,, London, pp. 295-335.. ,(1985)
Hilton L. Root, José Edgardo L. Campos, The Key to the Asian Miracle: Making Shared Growth Credible ,(1996)
Nathaniel H Leff, Entrepreneurship and Economic Development: The Problem Revisited Journal of Economic Literature. ,vol. 17, pp. 46- 64 ,(1979)
Alice H. Amsden, Korea's competitive edge: Managing entry into world markets Journal of Development Economics. ,vol. 22, pp. 393- 396 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0304-3878(86)90137-9
R. S. Milne, Andrew MacIntyre, Business and Politics in Indonesia. Pacific Affairs. ,vol. 65, pp. 439- ,(1992) , 10.2307/2760108
Hal Hill, Indonesia's Industrial Policy and Performance: "Orthodoxy" Vindicated Economic Development and Cultural Change. ,vol. 45, pp. 147- 174 ,(1996) , 10.1086/452261