摘要: This paper argues that there are true synthetic modal claims and questions in philosophy to be interpreted not terms of logical necessity but necessity. I begin by sketching the debate about modality between empiricism phenome-nology. Logical taught us equate analyticity neces-sity. The now common view is analytic statements necessary narrow sense also a wider sense. argue against this we should distinguish more strictly.
sci-hub.st 参考文章(17)
Jerrold J. Katz, The Problem in Twentieth-Century Philosophy The Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 95, pp. 547- 575 ,(1998) , 10.2307/2564651
Dietrich von Hildebrand Gesellschaft, Das Wesen der Liebe J. Habbel. ,(1971)
David Braine, Michael Clark, Varieties of Necessity Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. ,vol. 46, pp. 139- 188 ,(1972) , 10.1093/ARISTOTELIANSUPP/46.1.139
Max Scheler, Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik ,(2014)
Saul Aaron Kripke, Naming and Necessity ,(1980)
Adolf Reinach, Die apriorischen Grundlagen des bürgerlichen Rechtes Max Niemeyer. ,(1913)
Barry Smith, An Essay on Material Necessity Canadian Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 18, pp. 301- 322 ,(1992) , 10.1080/00455091.1992.10717307
Willard Van Orman Quine, Two Dogmas of Empiricism ,(1951)
Richard Swinburne, The Christian God ,(1994)
Clarence Irving Lewis, An analysis of knowledge and valuation ,(1947)