Beyond Euroscepticism. A Multidimensional Perspective

作者: Danilo Di Mauro , Vincenzo Memoli

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42954-0_1

关键词:

摘要: This chapter focuses on the definition of attitudes toward Europe, showing limits concept Euroscepticism. was recently challenged by theoretical approaches, that EU have multiple dimensions. By providing arguments and reviewing empirical tests, authors claim that: (1) people distinguish between diffuse support specific support; (2) European identity could be considered empirically a different dimension for Europe; (3) citizens (diffuse specific) process integration. The conclude Easton’s is better descriptor Europe than Euroscepticism, both in terms.

参考文章(27)
Fabio Serricchio, Paolo Bellucci, David Sanders, Explaining European Identity Oxford University Press. ,(2012)
Laurie Beaudonnet, Danilo Di Mauro, Support for Europe: Assessing the Complexity of Individual Attitudes Social Science Research Network. ,(2012)
Paul M. Sniderman, Willem E. Saris, Studies in public opinion : attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change Princeton University Press. ,(2004)
Aleks Szczerbiak, Paul Taggart, The party politics of euroscepticism in EU member and candidate states Sussex European Institute, University of Sussex. ,(2002)
SIMON USHERWOOD, NICK STARTIN, Euroscepticism as a Persistent Phenomenon Journal of Common Market Studies. ,vol. 51, pp. 1- 16 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1468-5965.2012.02297.X
David Easton, A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support British Journal of Political Science. ,vol. 5, pp. 435- 457 ,(1975) , 10.1017/S0007123400008309
PAUL TAGGART, A touchstone of dissent: Euroscepticism in contemporary Western European party systems European Journal of Political Research. ,vol. 33, pp. 363- 388 ,(1998) , 10.1111/1475-6765.00387