The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy ("lie detection") with event-related brain potentials.

作者: Lawrence A. Farwell , Emanuel Donchin

DOI: 10.1111/J.1469-8986.1991.TB01990.X

关键词:

摘要: The feasibility of using Event Related Brain Potentials (ERPs) in Interrogative Polygraphy (“Lie Detection”) was tested by examining the effectiveness Guilty Knowledge Test designed Farwell and Donchin (1986, 1988). subject is assigned an arbitrary task requiring discrimination between experimenter-designated targets other, irrelevant stimuli. A group diagnostic items (“probes”), which to unwitting are indistinguishable from items, embedded among irrelevant. For subjects who possess “guilty knowledge” these probes distinct irrelevants likely elicit a P300, thus revealing their possessing special knowledge that allows them differentiate irrelevants. We report two experiments this paradigm tested. In Experiment 1, 20 participated one mock espionage scenarios were for both scenarios. All stimuli consisted short phrases presented 300 ms each at interstimulus interval 1550 ms. set designated as “targets” appeared on 17% trials. Probes related also rest Subjects responded pressing switch following targets, other (and, course, probes). ERPs recorded Fz, Cz, Pz. As predicted, elicited large P300s all subjects. associated with given scenario P300 scenario. bootstrapping method used assess quality decision subject. algorithm declared indeterminate 12.5% cases. cases made. There no false positives negatives: whenever determination made it accurate. second experiment virtually identical first, results, except time 4 tested, had minor brush law. determine whether they possessed information own “crimes.” results expected; determined correctly information. implications data practice interpretation discussed.

参考文章(20)
John W. Rohrbaugh, Anthony W.K. Gaillard, 13 Sensory and Motor Aspects of the Contingent Negative Variation Advances in psychology. ,vol. 10, pp. 269- 310 ,(1983) , 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62044-0
Emanuel Donchin, Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? Psychophysiology. ,vol. 18, pp. 493- 513 ,(1981) , 10.1111/J.1469-8986.1981.TB01815.X
Ray Johnson, A Triarchic Model of P300 Amplitude Psychophysiology. ,vol. 23, pp. 367- 384 ,(1986) , 10.1111/J.1469-8986.1986.TB00649.X
EMANUEL DONCHIN, WALTER RITTER, W. CHEYNE MCCALLUM, COGNITIVE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY: THE ENDOGENOUS COMPONENTS OF THE ERP Brain event-related potentials in man; New York: Academic Press. pp. 349- 411 ,(1978) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-155150-6.50019-5
W. GREY WALTER, R. COOPER, V. J. ALDRIDGE, W. C. McCALLUM, A. L. WINTER, CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION: AN ELECTRIC SIGN OF SENSORIMOTOR ASSOCIATION AND EXPECTANCY IN THE HUMAN BRAIN. Nature. ,vol. 203, pp. 380- 384 ,(1964) , 10.1038/203380A0
J. Peter Rosenfeld, Victoria Tepe Nasman, Richard Whalen, Brad Cantwell, Lisa Mazzeri, Late Vertex Positivity in Event-Related Potentials as a Guilty Knowledge Indicator: A New Method of Lie Detection International Journal of Neuroscience. ,vol. 34, pp. 125- 129 ,(1987) , 10.3109/00207458708985947
Steven A. Hillyard, Kenneth C. Squires, Nancy K. Squires, Decision-related cortical potentials during an auditory signal detection task with cued observation intervals Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. ,vol. 1, pp. 268- 279 ,(1975) , 10.1037//0096-1523.1.3.268
David T. Lykken, The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking. Journal of Applied Psychology. ,vol. 44, pp. 258- 262 ,(1960) , 10.1037/H0044413
M Kutas, S. Hillyard, Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity Science. ,vol. 207, pp. 203- 205 ,(1980) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.7350657
Connie C. Duncan-Johnson, Emanuel Donchin, On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology. ,vol. 14, pp. 456- 467 ,(1977) , 10.1111/J.1469-8986.1977.TB01312.X