Patient and Health Care Professional Decision-Making to Commence and Withdraw from Renal Dialysis: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research

作者: Jamilla A. Hussain , Kate Flemming , Fliss E.M. Murtagh , Miriam J. Johnson

DOI: 10.2215/CJN.11091114

关键词:

摘要: Background and objective To ensure that decisions to start stop dialysis in ESRD are shared, the factors affect patients health care professionals making such must be understood. This systematic review sought explore how why different mediate choices about treatment. Design, setting, participants, & measurements MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsychINFO were searched for qualitative studies of patients’ or professionals’ commence withdraw from dialysis. A thematic synthesis was conducted. Results Of 494 articles screened, 12 (conducted 1985 2014) included. These involved 206 (most receiving hemodialysis) 64 (age ranges: patients, 26–93 years; professionals, 26–61 years). For commencing dialysis, based their choice on "gut instinct," as well deliberating over effect treatment quality life survival. How individuals coped with decision-making influential: Some tried take control problem progressive renal failure, whereas others focused controlling emotions. Health weighed biomedical led by an instinct prolong life. Both described feeling powerless. With regard withdrawal, only after prolonged periods realities fully appreciated past questioned. By this stage, however, physically dependent As seen withdrawal a problem- emotion-controlling way. Families struggled differentiate between choosing versus allowing death. teams avoided queried discussions regarding withdrawal. Patients, missed dialogue they experienced during predialysis education. Conclusions Decision-making is complex dynamic evolves time toward The at work multifaceted operate differently professionals. More training research open communication shared needed.

参考文章(46)
D M Breckenridge, Patients' perceptions of why, how, and by whom dialysis treatment modality was chosen American Nephrology Nurses' Association journal. ,vol. 24, pp. 313- 321 ,(1997)
Gokulnath, Prashanth G Kedleya, Shobhana G Nayak, Usha Bapat, Demographics and social factors associated with acceptance of treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease. Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation. ,vol. 19, pp. 132- ,(2008)
Daniel Kahneman, Shane Frederick, Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press. pp. 49- 81 ,(2002) , 10.1017/CBO9780511808098.004
Elin M. Aasen, Marit Kvangarsnes, Kåre Heggen, Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end-stage renal disease in a dialysis unit Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. ,vol. 26, pp. 61- 69 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1471-6712.2011.00904.X
Helen Noble, Julienne Meyer, Jackie Bridges, Daniel Kelly, Barbara Johnson, Reasons Renal Patients Give for Deciding Not to Dialyze: A Prospective Qualitative Interview Study Dialysis & Transplantation. ,vol. 38, pp. 82- 89 ,(2009) , 10.1002/DAT.20288
Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology Qualitative Research in Psychology. ,vol. 3, pp. 77- 101 ,(2006) , 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
Alison E Tweed, Karen Ceaser, Renal replacement therapy choices for pre-dialysis renal patients British Journal of Nursing. ,vol. 14, pp. 659- 664 ,(2005) , 10.12968/BJON.2005.14.12.18287
JK McKenzie, AH Moss, TG Feest, CB Stocking, M Siegler, Dialysis decision making in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States American Journal of Kidney Diseases. ,vol. 31, pp. 12- 18 ,(1998) , 10.1053/AJKD.1998.V31.PM9428446