作者: Benedict Esmond Singleton , Russell Fielding
DOI: 10.1186/S40152-017-0061-9
关键词:
摘要: Whaling is a globally controversial topic, and Faroese drive-style whaling, grindadrap, no exception. A complex common-pool resource (CPR) institution, viewable from multiple moral, social, economic political viewpoints, grindadrap challenge to assess. Responding calls utilise more relationship-centred multi-perspectival approaches studying CPRs, this article examines utilising the theory of socio-cultural viability, which asserts diverse understandings world can be classified within fourfold typology that ‘successful’ institutions draw on all four social solidarities in dealing with challenges arise. The analysis reveals how throughout grindadrap’s history its place society has been maintained through enforcement largely egalitarian conceptualisation. However, meeting various around distribution meat, sustainability killing methods, institution accepted solutions alternative conceptualisations. It adaptability allowed remain popular part society, even as dependence pilot whale meat declined. issue toxins found arguably greatest threat undermining foundations practice, response something currently process negotiation.