Subjective Effects of Alcohol Predict Alcohol Choice in Social Drinkers.

作者: Jingfei Li , Conor H. Murray , Jessica Weafer , Harriet Wit

DOI: 10.1111/ACER.14476

关键词:

摘要: Introduction Alcohol is among the most commonly used psychoactive drugs, yet it can produce markedly different subjective effects in people. Certain effects, including both heightened stimulatory and lesser sedative are thought to predict repeated or excessive use. However, we do not fully understand nature of these individual differences their relationships alcohol consumption. This controlled laboratory study examined physiologic responses a moderate dose social drinkers relation subjects' decision consume alcohol. Methods Healthy adult volunteers (N = 95) participated 5-session double-blind choice study. On first 4 sessions, they received (0.8 g/kg) placebo alternating order, on fifth session, chose consumed whichever 2 preferred. During each participants completed Profile Mood States (POMS) Biphasic Effects Scale (BAES) questionnaires had vitals recorded every 30 minutes. We compared response during sampling sessions who session 5. Results Of 95 participants, 55 (choosers) 40 (nonchoosers). In full sample, produced its expected (e.g., increased friendliness, elation, vigor (POMS), stimulation sedation (BAES)). The chooser nonchooser groups did differ demographic characteristics, blood levels, cardiovascular measures. choosers experienced greater alcohol-induced increases positive mood liked drug more, whereas nonchoosers anger, anxiety after Conclusion Both predicted preference under conditions, suggesting that factors future consumption

参考文章(41)
J. E. Henningfield, J. L. Katz, C. W. Schindler, K. L. Preston, Richard J Lamb, S. R. Goldberg, F. Davis, R. A. Meisch, The reinforcing and subjective effects of morphine in post-addicts: a dose-response study. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. ,vol. 259, pp. 1165- 1173 ,(1991)
Mary-Anne Enoch, David Goldman, The genetics of alcoholism and alcohol abuse Current Psychiatry Reports. ,vol. 3, pp. 144- 151 ,(2001) , 10.1007/S11920-001-0012-3
Robert L. Balster, George E. Bigelow, Guidelines and methodological reviews concerning drug abuse liability assessment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. ,vol. 70, pp. 13- 40 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00097-8
Patricia J. Conrod, Robert O. Pihl, Jasmin Vassileva, Differential sensitivity to alcohol reinforcement in groups of men at risk for distinct alcoholism subtypes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. ,vol. 22, pp. 585- 597 ,(1998) , 10.1111/J.1530-0277.1998.TB04297.X
H. Wit, E. H. Uhlenhuth, J. Pierri, C. E. Johanson, Individual Differences in Behavioral and Subjective Responses to Alcohol Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. ,vol. 11, pp. 52- 59 ,(1987) , 10.1111/J.1530-0277.1987.TB01263.X
William R. Corbin, Ashley Gearhardt, Kim Fromme, Stimulant alcohol effects prime within session drinking behavior. Psychopharmacology. ,vol. 197, pp. 327- 337 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S00213-007-1039-X
Meghan E. Morean, Harriet de Wit, Andrea C. King, Mehmet Sofuoglu, Sandra Y. Rueger, Stephanie S. O’Malley, The drug effects questionnaire: psychometric support across three drug types Psychopharmacology. ,vol. 227, pp. 177- 192 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S00213-012-2954-Z
Matthew G. Kirkpatrick, Harriet de Wit, In the company of others: social factors alter acute alcohol effects. Psychopharmacology. ,vol. 230, pp. 215- 226 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S00213-013-3147-0
Marc A Schuckit, Tom L Smith, Ryan S Trim, Rhonda C Allen, Tsutomu Fukukura, Emily E Knight, Erin M Cesario, Sara A Kreikebaum, None, A Prospective Evaluation of How a Low Level of Response to Alcohol Predicts Later Heavy Drinking and Alcohol Problems American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. ,vol. 37, pp. 479- 486 ,(2011) , 10.3109/00952990.2011.598590
H. DeWit, J. Pierri, C. E. Johanson, Assessing individual differences in ethanol preference using a cumulative dosing procedure Psychopharmacology. ,vol. 98, pp. 113- 119 ,(1989) , 10.1007/BF00442016