The Laffer curve revisited

作者: Mathias Trabandt , Harald Uhlig

DOI: 10.1016/J.JMONECO.2011.07.003

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Laffer curves for the US, EU-14 and individual European countries are compared, using a neoclassical growth model featuring “constant Frisch elasticity” (CFE) preferences. New tax rate data is provided. The US can maximally increase revenues by 30% with labor taxes 6% capital taxes. We obtain 8% 1% EU-14. There, 54% of cut 79% self-financing. consumption curve does not peak. Endogenous human accumulation affect results quantitatively. Household heterogeneity may be important, while transition matters greatly.

参考文章(46)
Peter Birch Sørensen, Measuring the tax burden on capital and labor Research Papers in Economics. ,vol. 1, ,(2004)
Christopher A Pissarides, L. Rachel Ngai, Welfare Policy and the Sectoral Distribution of Employment Review of Economic Dynamics. ,(2009)
Marianne Baxter, Fiscal Policy in General Equilibrium The American Economic Review. ,vol. 83, pp. 315- 334 ,(1990)
Robert G. King, Charles I. Plosser, Sergio T. Rebelo, Production, Growth and Business Cycles: Technical Appendix Computing in Economics and Finance. ,vol. 20, pp. 87- 116 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1020529028761
Thomas F Cooley, None, Frontiers of business cycle research Princeton University Press. ,(1995)
Charles I. Jones, Introduction to Economic Growth ,(1997)
Kjetil Storesletten, Giovanni L. Violante, Jonathan Heathcote, Redistributive Taxation in a Partial-Insurance Economy 2010 Meeting Papers. ,(2010)
Levine Ross, Renelt David, A SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF CROSS-COUNTRY GROWTH REGRESSIONS The American Economic Review. ,vol. 82, pp. 942- 963 ,(1992)
Peter N. Ireland, Supply-side economics and endogenous growth Journal of Monetary Economics. ,vol. 33, pp. 559- 571 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0304-3932(94)90043-4
Neil Bruce, Stephen J. Turnovsky, Budget Balance, Welfare, and the Growth Rate: "Dynamic Scoring" of the Long-Run Government Budget Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. ,vol. 31, pp. 162- 186 ,(1999) , 10.2307/2601228