摘要: This article identifies and examines 5 conundrums confronting therapeutic jurisprudence. Is jurisprudence distinguishable from other jurisprudences that share its goal of using the law to improve well-being others (the identity dilemma)? Can term be defined in a meaningful way definitional Will vagaries empirical research, on which heavily relies, doom proposals dilemma indeterminacy)? How will proposal benefits only subgroup those it affects implemented rule When how should balanced against countervailing constitutional social policies balancing