The Argument Dependency Model

作者: Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky , Matthias Schlesewsky

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00030-4

关键词:

摘要: This chapter summarizes the architecture of extended Argument Dependency Model (eADM), a model language comprehension that aspires toward neurobiological plausibility. It combines design principles from neurobiology with insights on cross-linguistic diversity. Like other current models, eADM posits auditory processing proceeds along two distinct streams in brain emanating cortex: antero-ventral and postero-dorsal streams. Both are organized hierarchically information takes place cascaded fashion. Each stream has functionally unified computational properties congruent its role primate audition. While dorsal performs sequence (i.e., noncommutative combinatorics) temporal receptive windows increasing size, ventral dependency formation (commutative comprising recognition increasingly complex feature-rich) objects their combinations. The discusses how these assumptions can derive range neuroanatomical neurophysiological findings.

参考文章(93)
T. Givón, Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 1- ,(1983) , 10.1075/TSL.3.01GIV
Caroline Féry, Alla Paslawska, Gisbert Fanselow, Lydia Grebenyova, Arthur Stepanov, Ivelina K Tchizmarova, Michael K Launer, Marjorie J McShane, Ian Press, AM Mordovan, SS Skorvid, AA Kibrik, NV Rogova, EI Jakuskina, AF Zuravlev, SM Tolstaja, Milorad Radovanovic, Nedzad Leko, Charles Townsend, Ivan Igartua, Nominal Split Constructions in Ukrainian Journal of Slavic Linguistics. ,vol. 15, pp. 3- ,(2007)
Lee Osterhout, Peter Hagoort, Colin M. Brown, The neurocognition of syntactic processing Brown, C.M.; Hagoort, P. (ed.), Neurocognition of Language. pp. 273- 317 ,(1999)
Ina Bornkessel, The Argument Dependency Model: A neurocognitive approach to incremental interpretation Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience Leipzig. ,(2002)
Noam Chomsky, Minimalist inquiries : the framework Distributed by MIT Working Papers in Lingustics. ,(1998)
A.D. Milner, H.C. Dijkerman, R.D. McIntosh, Y. Rossetti, L. Pisella, Delayed reaching and grasping in patients with optic ataxia. Progress in Brain Research. ,vol. 142, pp. 225- 242 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0079-6123(03)42016-5
Angela D. Friederici, The Neurobiology of Language Comprehension Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 263- 301 ,(1998) , 10.1007/978-3-642-59967-5_9
Andriy Myachykov, Dominic Thompson, Christoph Scheepers, Simon Garrod, Visual Attention and Structural Choice in Sentence Production Across Languages Language and Linguistics Compass. ,vol. 5, pp. 95- 107 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1749-818X.2010.00265.X
Gregory Hickok, David Poeppel, The cortical organization of speech processing Nature Reviews Neuroscience. ,vol. 8, pp. 393- 402 ,(2007) , 10.1038/NRN2113
Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Tanja Grewe, Matthias Schlesewsky, Prominence vs. aboutness in sequencing: A functional distinction within the left inferior frontal gyrus Brain and Language. ,vol. 120, pp. 96- 107 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.BANDL.2010.06.004