Priority setting: lessons from Oregon

作者: Jennifer Dixon , H Gilbert Welch

DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90213-9

关键词:

摘要: The state of Oregon has developed a unique method to set priorities for health services. is based on cost-utility formula but also incorporates public attitudes and values. Using an explicit process, the Health Services Commission completed ranking 714 condition-treatment pairs. background, methods, criticisms approach highlight key questions managers physicians in other services when they allocate limited resources.

参考文章(16)
Malcolm Dean, London Perspective: End of a comprehensive NHS? The Lancet. ,vol. 337, pp. 351- 352 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90961-N
Michael D. Reagan, HEALTH CARE RATIONING AND COST CONTAINMENT ARE NOT SYNONYMOUS Review of Policy Research. ,vol. 9, pp. 219- 231 ,(1989) , 10.1111/J.1541-1338.1989.TB01121.X
John Kitzhaber, The Oregon Health Initiative. The Lancet. ,vol. 334, pp. 106- ,(1989) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)90346-2
Arnold S. Relman, The trouble with rationing The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 323, pp. 911- 913 ,(1990) , 10.1056/NEJM199009273231310
B Packwood, National policy prospectives. Oregonʼs bold idea Academic Medicine. ,vol. 65, pp. 632- 3 ,(1990) , 10.1097/00001888-199010000-00006
S. Ford, Rationing health care BMJ. ,vol. 302, pp. 288- 288 ,(1991) , 10.1136/BMJ.302.6771.288-A
F. Honigsbaum, Rationing health care BMJ. ,vol. 302, pp. 288- 289 ,(1991) , 10.1136/BMJ.302.6771.288-B
Daniel Callahan, Rationing Medical Progress New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 322, pp. 1810- 1813 ,(1990) , 10.1056/NEJM199006213222511
H. Gilbert Welch, Eric B. Larson, Dealing with Limited Resources The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 319, pp. 171- 173 ,(1988) , 10.1056/NEJM198807213190310