Defining the Resilience Dividend: Accounting for Co-benefits of Resilience Planning

作者: Juan Fung , Jennifer Helgeson

DOI: 10.6028/NIST.TN.1959

关键词:

摘要: This report presents the concept of the resilience dividend as a useful metric for community resilience planning. The report suggests defining the resilience dividend as the net co-benefit (or co-cost) of investing in enhanced resilience, in the absence of a disruptive incident. In order for this definition to be useful, the report reviews literature on co-benefits. The main lessons from this review are that: (1) there is no consensus on the use of the meaning of co-benefit; (2) much of the literature on co-benefits is focused on climate change; and (3) there exist opportunities for the development of co-benefit measurement and assessment methodologies in the context of resilience planning. This report provides guidance and direction on the study and use of the resilience dividend by categorizing the various definitions of co-benefits to provide a frame of reference, reviewing measurement and assessment efforts, and summarizing the review in an annotated bibliography that can serve as a "quick guide" for researchers and practitioners looking for existing work on co-benefits. The report also highlights potential directions for future research.

参考文章(27)
Daniel Plaza-Bonilla, José Luis Arrúe, Carlos Cantero-Martínez, Rosario Fanlo, Ana Iglesias, Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes, Carbon management in dryland agricultural systems. A review Agronomy for Sustainable Development. ,vol. 35, pp. 1319- 1334 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S13593-015-0326-X
Sébastien Dessus, David O'Connor, Climate Policy Without Tears: CGE-Based Ancillary Benefits Estimates for Chile Environmental and Resource Economics. ,vol. 25, pp. 287- 317 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1024469430532
David Mitchell, Paul Enemark, Stig., van der Molen, Climate resilient urban development : why responsible land governance is important Land Use Policy. ,vol. 48, pp. 190- 198 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2015.05.026
Caroline Wenger, Better use and management of levees: reducing flood risk in a changing climate Environmental Reviews. ,vol. 23, pp. 240- 255 ,(2015) , 10.1139/ER-2014-0060
W.S.A. Saunders, J.S. Becker, A discussion of resilience and sustainability: Land use planning recovery from the Canterbury earthquake sequence, New Zealand International journal of disaster risk reduction. ,vol. 14, pp. 73- 81 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.IJDRR.2015.01.013
Rasmus Klocker Larsen, Emma Calgaro, Frank Thomalla, Governing resilience building in Thailand's tourism-dependent coastal communities: Conceptualising stakeholder agency in social–ecological systems Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 21, pp. 481- 491 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2010.12.009
Emile A. Frison, Jeremy Cherfas, Toby Hodgkin, Agricultural Biodiversity Is Essential for a Sustainable Improvement in Food and Nutrition Security Sustainability. ,vol. 3, pp. 238- 253 ,(2011) , 10.3390/SU3010238
Roger-Mark De Souza, A Little Bit of Sugar Helps the Pill Go Down: Resilience, Peace, and Family Planning Comment on "The Pill Is Mightier Than the Sword" International Journal of Health Policy and Management. ,vol. 5, pp. 113- 116 ,(2015) , 10.15171/IJHPM.2015.175
Malcolm Potts, Aafreen Mahmood, Alisha A. Graves, The Pill is Mightier Than the Sword International Journal of Health Policy and Management. ,vol. 4, pp. 507- 510 ,(2015) , 10.15171/IJHPM.2015.109
S. Şerban Scrieciu, Valerie Belton, Zaid Chalabi, Reinhard Mechler, Daniel Puig, Advancing methodological thinking and practice for development-compatible climate policy planning Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. ,vol. 19, pp. 261- 288 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S11027-013-9538-Z